Archive | 2001 RSS feed for this section

The E*TRADE Monkey Returns!

(Newstream) — E*TRADE is back for Super Bowl XXXV in a big way-and is capitalizing on some “star power” from last year. The E*TRADE “Monkey” will be back for Super Bowl XXXV, this time with an important new message.

E*TRADE will be returning to the Super Bowl for the second straight year with a very strong, unique and integrated presence aimed at promoting our new brand identity, “It’s Your Money.”

The Spots

E*TRADE will run 2 spots during the Super Bowl, 6 spots during the pre-game along with 3 Returns of the Year and 3 spots during the Road to the Super Bowl Special Saturday on CBS. In addition, for the second year in a row, E*TRADE is the title sponsor of the E*TRADE Super Bowl XXXV Halftime Show – featuring Aerosmith and NSYNC and produced by MTV.

E*TRADE will air action-packed spots that communicate E*TRADE’s growth and evolution into an integrated financial services company, including an online banking (E*TRADE Bank), retirement products and much more. Plus, the E*TRADE “Monkey” returns with a surprising and powerful public service message.

E*TRADE’s “Monkey” spot from last year was recently recognized by CBS producers and USA Today as one of the Ten Greatest Super Bowl Commercials of all time. Not bad for a commercial that is barely one year old! Last year’s “ER” spot was a hit with the viewers and critics alike, and drove the phrase “money coming out the wazoo” into modern pop culture.

——————-

Produced for E*TRADE

Contacts:

Jeff Kruger, E*TRADE Sara Brown Riggs, Hill & Knowlton 650/331-6126

Loved the ads, but who was advertising in the Super Bowl?

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010129/en/television-superbowlads_1.html

By Jennifer Laidlaw

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Yes, you just loved those Super Bowl ads, but can you remember who was advertising?

Although it’s a sure thing that the Baltimore Ravens crushed the New York Giants in Sunday’s Super Bowl XXXV in Tampa, there’s no certainty that consumers will remember the game’s multimillion-dollar ads, advertising experts say.

Although some were funny and entertaining, at an average of $2.3 million for a 30-second spot, most of them should have been more memorable, they say.

“Overall everybody was going for laughs and not much selling,” said Jack Trout, president of Connecticut-based marketing strategy firm Trout & Partners. “They are all trapped in this thing that ‘we have to get everyone to laugh.”

With an audience of 130 million, the Super Bowl has become an Ad Bowl, which advertisers use to kick off new campaigns. But while Super Bowl veterans like Budweiser brewer Anheuser-Busch Inc. and PepsiCo Inc. usually know how to woo the audience, most of the ads will just pass most consumers by.

Industry experts said Anheuser-Busch’s commercials were the funniest and most memorable, especially the one where its character Cedric accidentally sprays his Bud Light over his date while trying to woo her.

While the ad was funny, it wasn’t completely clear what message the company was trying to sell, Trout said. “That was hysterical but I don’t know where Bud Light comes in there.”

“And Volkswagen with a car up a tree, what was that about?” Trout said, referring to a Volkswagen ad which has two men throwing things at a tree and then suddenly a red Volkswagen falls out.

“Certainly some of the Budweiser commercials were entertaining,” said Bob Bloom, chief exective of the U.S. operations of French advertising giant Publicis Groupe SA. “Other commercials were just entertaining and (some) were just over the top. One couldn’t figure out what the strategy was,” he said.

While a beer brand can entertain because it is supposed to be a product that you enjoy, it doesn’t work for other things like brokerages, Bloom said. For example, “you don’t go to the broker which entertains you the most. As an advertiser, you have a greater goal than to simply entertain,” he said.

While this year’s commercials were certainly much better than last year when 17 dot-coms advertised, industry watchers said that too many were too vague, which would certainly not score a touchdown with viewers.

“Vague and funny is how I would score the Super Bowl,” Trout said. One that got particularly panned by industry experts was the rebranding campaign by Andersen Consulting, which recently changed its name to Accenture.

One of the Accenture ad featured long-distance surgery while another had a man test driving a car who suddenly disappears. “Accenture was just weird. You had no idea what they were selling,” Trout said.

Experts said that the ads that really seemed to hit the mark were from traditional Super Bowl advertising all-stars like Anheuser-Busch and PepsiCo, which both use agencies owned by Omnicom Group — BBDO for Pepsi and DDB for Anheuser.

“It was the Omnicom bowl,” said Brian Goodall, president of New York-based advertising company Hampel Stefanides. “These agencies really pull out all the stops to get noticed.”

One Pepsi spot that was a big hit was a parody on Viagra in which former Sen. Bob Dole revealed his youthful and vibrant self was due to drinking Pepsi.

“It worked because of the mood. You had the expectations that it was going to be another Viagra ad,” said Spencer Brown, president and CEO of agency Tyee Euro RSCG.

Another big winner was Web broker E+Trade, which is rapidly becoming a Super Bowl veteran. It grabbed attention this year with a take-off of last year’s dot-com ads, with a “Planet of the Apes”-type monkey that sheds a tear when he sees bits and pieces from dot-com companies all rusted and broken.

“It just seemed to be the perfect parody and it was effective because the point E+Trade made was ‘stick with the basics and we can help you,”‘ Brown said.

Arnold Takes VW, Monster.com to Superbowl

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/bpiaw/20001227/ad/_b_h1_arnold_takes_vw_monster_com_to_superbowl_h1_b__1.html

BOSTON–Arnold Worldwide is looking to CBS’s Jan. 28 telecast of the Super Bowl to score big for two of its premier clients: Volkswagen of America and Monster.com.

VW will be the “exclusive” in-game automobile advertiser for Super Bowl XXXV, a deal sources said likely cost at least $10 million to secure. A representative from Boston-based Arnold declined to talk dollars. She did say, however, that VW will likely air at least two different 30-second spots, both tagged with the familiar “Drivers wanted” slogan. Each spot will run twice, and the new executions will plug existing car lines, such as the New Beetle or Passat, though the representative declined to go into detail.

This marks VW’s first drive through the Big Game; General Motors’ Pontiac is sponsoring the post-game show.

Monster.com, of course, has had a Super Bowl presence for the last two years through former agency Mullen of Wenham, Mass. Two new executions set for the upcoming Super Bowl will mark the job site’s first major work through Arnold since the agency won the client’s $75-90 million domestic assignment this summer.

Monster will run at least two different ads on the game introducing a new direction and theme designed to reposition the brand as an integral part of people’s lives, rather than simply a resource for finding jobs, sources said. Monster has confirmed that it will place four spots on the telecast but has revealed no other details.

–David Gianatasio

Levi’s Jeans Gets Into the Game With Its Advertising Debut in Super Bowl XXXV

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010108/ca_levi_st.html

SAN FRANCISCO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Super Bowl Marketing Overview

Continuing on the success of its “Make Them Your Own” campaign, the Levi’s® brand is getting into the game – the Super Bowl that is – for the first time in its history with a new multi-part television commercial, online activities and a retail program. With an estimated 80 million plus audience, Levi’s® views the Super Bowl as the perfect opportunity to launch their new Levi’s® Re-Issued 569(TM) Jeans for men.

Levi’s® “Jeans Donor” Commercial

The humorous story line of a three-part television spot, “Jeans Donor,” focuses on the Re-Issued 569(TM) Jeans, a loose, straight jean which is quickly becoming a “must have” for men. A new “Re-Issued” finish, which gives the jeans a worn-in, vintage look, is available for spring 2001.

“Jeans Donor” plays off of people’s attachment to their Levi’s® jeans and the growing trend towards wearing denim with a vintage-like, previously-worn look. The spot will unfold gradually throughout Super Bowl weekend with a prequel, the Super Bowl Spot, a sequel and a final all-inclusive spot. The spot is a continuation of the Levi’s® “Make Them Your Own” campaign which launched fall 2000 and brings to life what is at the core of the Levi’s® brand – people’s desire to express their individuality and unique personalities.

Innovative Media Strategy The spot will roll out in a unique three-part series as follows:

* “Jeans Donor” Prequel (:15) – Saturday, Jan. 27 – Sunday, Jan. 28,

* Concept: Consumers are teased with a spot that will leave them wondering what just happened on their TV screen

* Spot buy: MTV, ESPN Super Bowl-themed programs and syndicated NFL programming

* “Jeans Donor” (:30) – Sunday, Jan. 28

* Concept: A dramatic sequence of events, including the “saving” of a young man’s life by an unknowing jeans donor

* Spot buy: Super Bowl XXXV, second quarter, CBS

* “Jeans Donor” Sequel (:15) – Sunday, Jan. 28 – Monday, Jan. 29

* Concept: The jeans donor character is re-visited

* Spot buy: ESPN

* “Jeans Donor” (:60) – Sunday, Jan. 28 – Monday, Jan. 29

* Concept: The “Jeans Donor” story is shown in its entirety

* Spot buy: ESPN

The “Jeans Donor” spot was developed by Levi’s® partner TBWA/Chiat/Day, San Francisco.

Online Activities

Similar to the spot’s roll out on television, the “Jeans Donor” story will unfold on www.levi.com, including:

* Sneak Preview of “Jeans Donor” – the “Jeans Donor” prequel can be seen January 21-28 on levi.com. Consumers will be driven to levi.com for the Super Bowl ad preview via announcements through an online ad buy on key sports sites

* “Jeans Donor” (:60) – starting January 28 consumers can see the “Jeans Donor” spot in its entirety on levi.com, along with “where to buy” information for Levi’s® Re-Issued 569(TM) Jeans and other products

Retail Tie-in

Levis® will also be making noise in the Tampa area surrounding Super Bowl Weekend with a host of retail-based activities, including:

* Retail appearances — via a tie-in with Levi’s® retailer Dillards, the Levi’s® Make Them Your Own Zone, a traveling Levi’s® experience, which allows consumers to customize their Levi’s®, will make appearances (Friday, January 26 and Saturday, January 27) at two Dillards stores, offering consumers:

* A chance to win tickets to the NFL Experience

* An opportunity to win gift certificates for Levi’s® 569s or women’s Superlow jeans as well as a chance to customize other Levi’s® denim product

* Levi’s® “Make Them Your Own” giveaways

* “Jeans Donor” Cards – street teams will distribute “Jeans Donor” cards which will drive traffic to select Dillards locations

* Radio ad buy and promotion – beginning two weeks prior to Super Bowl Sunday, local Tampa radio listeners will have a chance to win new Levi’s® 569s or Superlows via a radio ad buy and promotion designed to drive traffic to retail appearances

Levi Strauss created the world’s first pair of jeans in 1873 and today is the number one jeans brand in the world. For more information on Levi’s visit www.levi.com.

Artwork available upon request

Contact:

Ketchum Jared Dougherty, 646/935-4048 jared.dougherty@ketchum.com or Levi Strauss & Co. Kendra Gourvitz, 415/501-1006 kgourvitz@levi.com or TBWA/Chiat/Day Jeremy Miller, 310/305-5511 jeremy.miller@tbwachiat.com

Super Bowl, or Snooper Bowl?

http://www.star-telegram.com:80/news/doc/1047/1:COMP13/1:COMP130211101.html

High-tech security system makes some nervous of Big Brother

By Vickie Chachere

Associated Press

TAMPA, Fla. — Super Bowl, or Snooper Bowl?

As 100,000 fans stepped through the turnstiles at Super Bowl XXXV, a camera snapped their image and matched it against a computerized police lineup of known criminals, from pickpockets to international terrorists.

It’s not a new kind of surveillance. But its use at the Super Bowl — dubbed “Snooper Bowl” by critics — has highlighted a debate about the balance between individual privacy and public safety.

Law enforcement officials say what was done at the Super Bowl is no more intrusive than routine video surveillance that most people encounter each day as they’re filmed in stores, banks, office buildings or apartment buildings.

But to critics, the addition of the face-recognition system can essentially put everyone in a police lineup.

“I think it presents a whole different picture of America,” said Howard Simon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Florida.

The technology, called biometrics, was created at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 1990s and has been adapted for dozens of uses, from keeping automatic tellers secure to creating driver’s license photographs.

It’s based on the theory that every person’s face is a slight spatial deviation of 128 “standard” faces. A face in a digital picture is converted into a numerical code that can be quickly compared with the faces in a database of thousands. The process takes just seconds.

The computer is programed to alert law enforcement when a match is made, and can flash a high-alert warning if it detects someone authorities have identified as particularly dangerous.

Casinos have used the technology to catch known cheats, and a system such as the one used at the Super Bowl is being tested in some U.S. airports, said Gretchen Lewis, marketing director for Viisage Technology, the Littleton, Mass., company that loaned the system to Tampa police for the Super Bowl.

The system is marketed under the name Facefinder. Viisage joined with Raytheon Co. and Graphco Technologies Inc. to construct the Super Bowl surveillance system.

“Companies are looking at the technology to look for disgruntled former employees who have been discharged and are not supposed to be on the property,” Lewis said. “You can set it up to do anything you want it to do.”

At the Super Bowl, signs advised fans that they were under video surveillance. Facefinder picked out 19 people — all petty criminals — whose faces matched a database created by Tampa police, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the FBI. No one was detained or questioned because Facefinder’s use for the Super Bowl was an experiment, Tampa police spokesman Joe Durkin said.

“It confirmed our suspicions that these types of criminals would be coming to the Super Bowl to try and prey on the public,” Durkin said.

“I think people appreciate we kept Super Bowl XXXV as safe as we did. Had we stopped a terrorist, the system would have proved priceless.”

The system also was used in Ybor City, Tampa’s nightlife district, which drew hundreds of thousands of people during Super Bowl week. No matches were made. The police department is considering buying Facefinder for use in Ybor City, where police have been using video camera surveillance without face-recognition software for several years.

Michael Levine, a former Drug Enforcement Administration agent and now radio talk show host in New York, said he agrees with law enforcement officials who say the security measures are needed in an age where tens of thousands of lives can be at risk in a single public event. And, he said, a computerized face-matching system is likely more accurate than a police officer’s own eyesight.

The problem, Levine said, is that public officials have shown no interest in limiting how police use their increasingly powerful tools.

In Tampa, the city council turned down an ACLU request for a public hearing on the use of Facefinder.

“When you have a nation that says ‘We don’t care, just go ahead and do it,’ you’re going to have that all over the country,” Levine said.

Civil liberties activists are using the Super Bowl surveillance as a sign that more attention is needed.

“If the public doesn’t object to what happened at the ‘Snooper Bowl,’ then the authorities will certainly feel emboldened to move us down the road to total surveillance,” said the ACLU’s Simon.

“I don’t minimize the threat of criminal activity when you have large crowds. Of course, there is a need for security,” he said. “There is a way to enforce the law consistent with fundamental American principles and there is a way to enforce the law consistent with totalitarian societies.”

Barry Hodge, vice president of marketing for Graphco Technologies, also noted a need for caution.

“There needs to be a really open, open positive public forum . . . as to what extent are we as individuals willing to compromise our personal privacy for public safety,” he said.

“It’s like any other tool, some of which are very, very positive and some of which could be very damaging if misused.”

——

On the Net:

Viisage Technology: www.viisage.com

American Civil Liberties Union: www.aclu.org

Distributed by The Associated Press (AP)

Super Bowl ads give local agencies annual fodder

http://phoenix.bcentral.com/phoenix/stories/2001/02/05/newscolumn4.html

Anne Robertson

Did you watch the big game?

Not the football part — the part where national advertisers jockey for their 30 seconds of $2.3 million fame.

Here in the Valley, Monday morning quarterbacking has produced a number of scorecards from many area ad agencies — judging which commercials made a touchdown, and which ones drew penalty flags during the “Superbowl of Advertising.”

So I decided to devote this week’s column to it.

Seems Anheuser-Busch earned collective high marks from a handful of Valley agencies for its self-effacing twists on the popular “Whassup” campaign.

And the E-Trade equestrian monkey riding through the ghost town of departed dot-coms struck many as a clever depiction of the country’s tech boom implosion.

Despite praise for a handful of standout spots, many agency folks found this year’s show less inspiring than years past.

“There were no historic spots this time, but there were a number of funny ones,” said Louie Moses, creative director at Moses Anshell, Phoenix.

Jeff Miraglia, creative director at E.B. Lane Marketing Communications, Phoenix, echoed the sentiment, saying the event did not produce any “breakthrough” work.

A few said the show delivered, and the dot-com loss did not affect the outcome.

“This year, the ads had more relevancy and were overall better,” said Mark Godfrey, vice president of branding at the Martz Agency, Scottsdale.

Following are the non-scientific results of a local survey from around the town:

Winner’s circle

The Anheuser-Busch alien pooch who returns to his planet to share his earthly knowledge amused and impressed observers. Some who thought the “Whassup” ads couldn’t spark any more chuckles were surprised.

“Totally unexpected” was how Miraglia described it.

“That campaign has been hugely successful,” said Ian Barry, creative director at Cramer-Krasselt, Phoenix. “It’s not only funny, it’s a continuation of the campaign.

“It’s a reflection of our culture — everybody knows that word but not where the capital is,” Barry said.

The yuppie “Whassup” spot also drew applause.

“It’s a really good formula — these are parodies of the “Whassup” campaign so it shows that the advertiser is not afraid to make fun of itself,” Godfrey said.

The return of the E-Trade primate scored well with everyone. The message that this tech company has thrived amid so much ruin resonated throughout the ad effectively, many agreed.

“I thought it was really poignant,” said Roger Hurni, creative director at Off Madison Ave, Tempe.

“It taught me a lot,” Miraglia said. “They acknowledged the dot-com downturn, but came across as a survivor, which is why they’re a credible company.”

Anheuser-Busch continued its top ratings with its Budweiser “dream date” disaster spot.

“Everybody laughed,” said Godfrey. “It’s not as sophisticated as some other ones, but we can’t say we didn’t love it.”

Hurni said the spot will be remembered.

“It’s one of those things that can’t be planned, an ad that Americans will latch onto and talk about,” he said.

Moses, who liked the spot, said the Budweiser ads faced a tough challenge posed by their prior success.

“Everyone expects Bud ads to be funny, so it’s a set up for failure. They did a good job,” he said.

Honorable mentions

The Monster.com commercial, where a new employee loves his new business cards and sniffs them like roses, received a few nods from observers.

“I liked it, it’s like a theme of life,” Barry said. “Life is short so be happy with your job.”

Dave Robb, creative director at Riester~Robb, Phoenix, said the ad carried through with a “nice, simple, clean thought.”

Another spot that caught some attention was the Levi’s donor-jean ad for a reissued brand the company is bringing “back to life.”

“It was effective because they told me they were bringing back the jeans, which made me want to check them out,” Moses said.

Mixed bag

A few ads aroused mixed responses, such as the Cingular spot featuring a disabled artist. The man has no use of his arms or legs but uses a paintbrush strapped to his head to produce beautiful art.

“The spot was about the ease of communication, and it stood out for me as very provocative and uplifting,” Robb said.

Miraglia said it separated itself as a powerful one that emphasized the “importance of expressing yourself.”

But others weren’t so sure it connected well with Cingular’s product, cell phones.

“It was metaphoric and cerebral, and it was beautiful, but I still don’t know what Cingular does,” Moses said.

Jeers to others

There were some that did not escape criticism, such as the much-hyped EDS “Running of the Squirrels” spot. Last year, the company gained attention for its cat-herding cowboys, and some suggested that big expectations leading up to this year’s ad may have caused the disappointment.

Others that failed to impress: The Doritos commercial that featured model Ali Landry, getting knocked to the ground by a Dorito flying out of a tennis ball machine; Subway dieters inspired by Jared’s diet; the Accenture campaign; and even the Legacy Foundation’s anti-smoking ads.

“I’m so tired of being told not to smoke, it makes me want to start,” Moses said.

Copyright 2001 American City Business Journals Inc. Click for permission to reprint (PRC# 1.1639.391978)

Super Bowl is dotcom kiss of death

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/15763.html

By: Linda Harrison in New York

The Super Bowl 2001 will not see the dotcom ad orgy of last year – mainly because many of the outfits that splashed out on the event have become dotcom dodos in the interim.

Just three dotcoms have so far coughed up the necessary $2.5 million for one of the 30-second spots on CBS in this month’s football fest – E-Trade, jobs sites Monster.com (going for its Super Bowl ad hat-trick this year) and Hotjobs.com. E-Trade is going all out – it is sponsoring the Super Bowl XXXV half-time show for the second consecutive year, while all 66,321 audience bottoms in the stadium will be resting on cushions emblazoned with the financial site’s logo.

Other dotcoms have not been so lucky – of the 17 technology or Internet companies that bought ad space for Super Bowl XXXIV, seven have gone out of business. These include Pets.com and Computers.com.

Meanwhile, some survivors have spurned the January 28 sporting extravaganza in favour of spreading their advertising money around other sporting events – Autotrader.com will not be repeating the Super Bowl ads this year, but will have TV ads during basketball games.

“The Super Bowl tripled our site traffic and really gave what was a brand associated with a print product a big boost,” Clark Wood, Autotrader VP marketing told The Industry Standard. “But to spend money on the Super Bowl this year would be a huge waste of money.”

Superbowl Drives Major Traffic Surge To CBS And Its Partner Web Sites

http://www.digitalbroadcasting.com/content/news/article.asp?DocID={DA10E557-F729-11D4-A770-00D0B7694F32}&Bucket=HomeLatestHeadlines&VNETCOOKIE=NO

http://www.jup.com/company/pressrelease.jsp?doc=pr010131

PR Contacts:

Max Kalehoff

Tel: 917-534-6222 Mary Helen Trent

Tel: 917-534-6167

Source: Jupiter Media Metrix

Massive unique visitor increases to CBS.com Sites, SportsLine.com Sites, SuperBowl.com, NFL and to this year’s dot-com advertisers

Benchmark year for successful in-program promotion, says Jupiter Analyst

NEW YORK, January 31, 2001 Jupiter Media Metrix (NASDAQ: JMXI), the global leader in market intelligence for the new economy, today reports that traffic to Web sites affiliated with CBS, the official broadcaster of Super Bowl XXXV, surged on Super Bowl Sunday and Monday. CBS.com Sites had 858,000 unique visitors on those two days, an increase of 201.5 percent over the previous three-week average, while SportsLine.com Sites had 1.1 million unique visitors, an increase of 84.5 percent. SuperBowl.com, which was produced and cross-promoted by SportsLine.com, Inc., had 833,000 unique visitors, a 377.8 percent increase over the previous three-week average. NFL Internet Group had over 1 million unique visitors, a 86.3 percent increase over the three-week average.

“Compared to last year’s Super Bowl, when traffic to most major sports sites remained flat in Media Metrix’ ratings, Super Bowl XXXV will be remembered as a benchmark year in which the game’s official broadcaster successfully drove massive traffic to online properties via in-game programming,” said Christopher Todd, analyst, Jupiter Research. “Simultaneous on-air promotion of both SuperBowl.com and CBS.SportsLine.com resulted in significant traffic increases to each property. Traffic to SuperBowl.com also was driven by the ability of fans to vote for the game’s MVP online.”

Traffic to other sports sites increased as well: CNNSI.com (CNN Sports Illustrated) and ESPN Sites had 475,000 and 1.4 million unique visitors, respectively, increases of 67.3 and 32.2 percent. Foxsports.com had 214,000 unique visitors, an increase of 62.8 percent.

Traffic to Dot-Com Advertisers in Super Bowl XXXV

While there were far fewer dot-com advertisers, the number of unique visitors to CBS affiliated sites, the broadcaster of this year’s Super Bowl, increased significantly. Etrade.com had 526,000 unique visitors, a 47.8 percent increase over the previous three-week period. Career sites Hotjobs.com and Monster.com had 328,000 and 706,000 unique visitors, respectively, increases of 101.3 and 5.3 percent.

Media Metrix
Select Sports Sites
Unique Visitors and Percent Growth During Super Bowl XXXV
At Home and Work in the U.S. – Sunday, Jan. 28 through Monday, Jan. 29, 2001
Select Sports Sites Previous 3-Week Average of Same 2-Day Period
(000) Total Unique Visitors Jan. 28-29
(000) Percent Increase Over Previous
3-Week Average
SUPERBOWL.COM 174 833 377.80%
CBS.COM SITES* 285 858 201.50%
NFL INTERNET GROUP* 585 1,091 86.3%
SPORTSLINE.COM SITES* 622 1,148 84.50%
CNNSI.COM* 284 475 67.30%
FOXSPORTS.COM 131 214 62.80%
ESPN* 1,032 1,364 32.20%
BROADBANDSPORTS.COM 89 98 10.20%
* Represents an aggregation of commonly owned/branded sites.

Media Metrix Dot-Com Super Bowl Advertisers
Unique Visitors and Percent Growth During Super Bowl XXXV
At Home and Work in the U.S. – Sunday, Jan. 28 through Monday, Jan. 29, 2001
Dot-Com AdvertisersPrevious 3-Week Average of Same 2-Day Period
(000) Total Unique Visitors Jan. 28-29
(000) Percent Increase Over Previous 3-Week Average
HOTJOBS.COM 163 328 101.30%
ETRADE.COM 356 526 47.80%
MONSTER.COM* 671 706 5.30%
* Represents an aggregation of commonly owned/branded sites.

Media Metrix Definitions: Unique Visitors: The actual number of total users who visited the reported Web site or online property at least once in the given time period. All Unique Visitors are unduplicated (only counted once) and are in thousands.

About Media Metrix Media Metrix, a Jupiter Media Metrix Company, is the leader and pioneer in Internet and Digital Media measurement and the industry’s source for the most comprehensive, reliable, and timely audience, e-commerce and technology measurement services. The Company provides the most comprehensive coverage of all Digital Media including more than 25,000 Web sites and online properties. Media Metrix utilizes its patented operating-system metering methodology to track Internet and Digital Media audience usage behavior in real-time – click-by-click, page-by-page, minute-by-minute. Today, Media Metrix has a representative sample of more than 100,000 people under measurement and covers more than 85 percent of Internet usage worldwide. Visit us at www.mediametrix.com for more information.

About Jupiter Media Metrix Jupiter Media Metrix is the global leader in market intelligence for the new economy. The company delivers innovative and comprehensive Internet measurement, analysis, intelligence and events to provide businesses with unmatched global resources for understanding and profiting from the Internet. Jupiter Media Metrix brings together world-class, innovative and market-leading products, services, research methodologies and people. Jupiter Media Metrix brands include Media Metrix, AdRelevance, Jupiter Research and Jupiter Events. The Company is headquartered in New York City and operates worldwide, across the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe (as Jupiter MMXI Europe), and the Middle East. Visit us at www.jmm.com for more information. This press release contains statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or future financial results of Jupiter Media Metrix. Investors are cautioned that such statements are only predictions and that actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating such statements, investors should specifically consider various factors, which could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated from such forward-looking statements, including the matters set forth in Jupiter Media Metrix reports and documents filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Super Bowl Fumbles With Web Fans

http://www.newsfactor.com:80/perl/story/7123.html

By Jay Lyman

NewsFactor Network

Web coverage proved no match for TV during Sunday’s Super Bowl, but the game’s official Web site drew record numbers, and fans reacted positively to online voting for the game’s MVP.

This year’s Super Bowl XXXV saw a smaller television audience than big games of the past, but the event did spike traffic to Superbowl.com, the official Super Bowl Web site, attracting some 359,000 unique visitors on the day of the game, according to audience measurement service Nielsen//Net Ratings.

While that is more than three times the number of Internet users who visited the site the day before the Super Bowl, most viewers logged on just before, just after or during the fourth quarter of the football game, Nielsen//Net Ratings vice president Allen Weiner told NewsFactor Network.

Weiner said that despite the heavy traffic to Superbowl.com, the National Football League’s (NFL) title game did not offer anything especially novel to Web fans.

Made for TV

“Superbowl.com had very strong traffic for the day, but it wasn’t the ilk of the [U.S. presidential] election, mostly because the Super Bowl is a TV event,” Weiner said. “It’s not a Web event.”

CBS, which broadcast the Baltimore Ravens’ one-sided 34-7 victory over the New York Giants, garnered approximately 131 million U.S. viewers for the televised game.

Weiner said that in the case of the Super Bowl, the Web site played a supporting role to the television broadcast of the game.

“I don’t think that the Super Bowl is designed to drive traffic to the Web site,” he said.

Wider Audience

There may not have been huge numbers of people watching the big game on their computer screens, but just as the typical football television audience is widened with the Super Bowl, so too was the big game’s Web audience, Weiner told NewsFactor.

“We did a comparison of traffic on Superbowl.com compared to a profile of the average sports person,” he said. “On TV, the Super Bowl gets more than the typical male sports guy — and the Web did too, with more women, more older people and more educated people.”

And while there was more Web traffic for this year’s Superbowl, the dot-com domination of television advertising from last year’s game was long gone. The Nielsen//Net Ratings showed that this year, brick-and-mortar companies accounted for 41 percent of Super Bowl advertisers.

Still, some technology firms invested heavily in Super Bowl ads, with “Digital Economy” advertisers accounting for 47 percent of the game’s television commercials.

Interactive Prospects

Nielsen//Net Ratings reports that Superbowl.com’s traffic quadrupled when television viewers were called on to vote for the game’s Most Valuable Player during the fourth quarter.

“As the Web and TV exist as disparate forces in today’s global media stage, it takes a strong call to action to transform viewers into surfers,” Weiner said. “The Web’s ability to give fans the opportunity to cast their cyber ballots obviously hit a nerve and sets the tone for other similar TV-to-Web interactions.”

Weiner said a Super Bowl or World Series on interactive television may be 3 or 4 years away, but the prospect holds great promise for advertisers and e-commerce.

“When you do have interactive TV, you can take advantage of it by selling the same championship t-shirts that the guys on the screen are wearing,” Weiner said. “It becomes the world’s biggest sports chat while you’re watching the game.”

“That is sort of nirvana,” said Weiner, “for an event like the Super Bowl or World Series.”

Super Bowl Ads Stir Violence Debate

http://washingtonpost.com:80/wp-dyn/articles/A63904-2001Jan29.html

By Christopher Stern

Washington Post Staff Writer

Just months after Hollywood pledged to take steps to stop marketing violent movies to underage children, film studios used the Super Bowl, with its huge family audience, to launch marketing campaigns for some particularly bloody movies.

Among the ads that aired during Sunday’s big game was a commercial for MGM’s R-rated “Hannibal,” which features a cannibalistic serial killer as its main character. Warner Bros. bought time during the pre-game show to advertise “Valentine,” which received an R rating for “strong horror violence” and “some sexuality.”

Warner Bros. also spent about $5 million for two 30-second spots for two other violent movies, “Exit Wounds” and “Swordfish.” Although neither movie has yet been rated, studio executives yesterday said they expect both films to get R ratings because of their violent content.

The Super Bowl “is a family activity, and many parents will be very alarmed to see this kind of graphic violence advertised,” said Kathryn Montgomery, president of the Center for Media Education, a public interest group that favors restrictions on Hollywood’s marketing efforts.

But several industry executives rejected the notion that there’s anything wrong with advertising an R-rated movie during the Super Bowl because the big game’s audience is predominately adult.

“You can’t avoid some spillover whenever you are dealing with broadcasting,” said MGM spokesman Craig Parsons. “We are not interested in reaching” children under 17, he said.

The commercials aired just days after Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (R-Conn.) announced he is writing legislation that would authorize the Federal Trade Commission to prosecute entertainment companies under laws that prohibit deceptive advertising.

Lieberman and other members of Congress insist that the movie industry is not doing enough in response to an FTC report issued last September that found that Hollywood is regularly promoting adult-rated violent movies to children. In addition, the FTC report found that the music and video-game industries regularly market adult entertainment to children.

“It was inappropriate to air these ads while millions of children were likely watching,” said Dan Gerstein, a spokesman for Lieberman. “This shows precisely why this legislation is needed.”

Motion Picture Association of America President Jack Valenti said yesterday that the studios are complying with guidelines issued by his organization in response to the FTC report. The guidelines, which do not mention television advertising, recommend that movie studios refrain from marketing R-rated movies to audiences attending G-rated films.

Valenti said he considered the advertisement for “Hannibal” to be a “very sensible” commercial for the general audience because the ad itself is not violent.

Brad Ball, president of domestic theatrical marketing for Warner Bros. Pictures, estimates that children under 17 made up just 17 percent of the Super Bowl audience. Nielsen Media Research estimated that the Super Bowl drew 131 million viewers. If Ball’s estimate is correct, 22.2 million people 17 or under were watching.

Ball said the studio is comfortable with its decision to advertise R-rated movies in Sunday’s big game. He noted that children are allowed to attend R-rated movies if they are accompanied by a parent or guardian.

ABC, which is owned by Walt Disney Co., has said publicly that it will not air commercials for R-rated movies before 9 p.m., but CBS — which broadcast the game — never made such a pledge. CBS spokesman Gil Schwartz said each ad was reviewed to ensure that it was consistent with the network’s standards and practices.

Anheuser-Busch, DDB agency win Super Bowl ad tussle

http://www.suntimes.com/output/lazare/lew30.html

BY LEWIS LAZARE

The votes are in, and no matter which way you slice and dice the results, Anheuser-Busch and its lead ad agency, DDB Chicago, were the big winners in the Super Bowl of advertising Sunday night.

AB was credited with five of the Top Ten Super Bowl ads, as ranked by USA Today’s much-hyped ad meter. About the only thing more surprising than that phenomenal showing was the lower-than-anticipated ranking for AB’s biggest splash of the night–the elaborate and expensive E.T.-inspired “Come Home” spot. Wall Street Journal marketing writer Suzanne Vranica raved about the special-effects-laden commercial, but ad meter voters placed “Come Home” only 10th on their list, below other simpler, but equally funny Bud Light commercials.

There were plenty of other advertisers who spent big bucks on the Super Bowl and came away disappointed. Count Pepsi among them. Though its limp Bob Dole spot scored better than most, many observers seemed to agree Pepsi didn’t deliver any breakthrough work.

Everyone wanted to like EDS’ “Running With the Squirrels,” the sequel to last year’s herding-cats commercial, but it failed to ignite much of a response from some viewers.

Accenture spots looked slick, but the obscure message seemed to sail right over the heads of some viewers. “Accenture needs a consultant,” cracked advertising professor Steve Edwards in the WSJ.

Perhaps the evening’s major disappointment was Volkswagen, which is held to a high standard among automotive advertisers. The car company’s big idea spot, a car falling out of a tree, must have looked good on paper. But the commercial landed with a loud thud in next-to-last place in the ad meter rankings.

The real top dog: DDB Chicago group creative director John Immesoete is the star of the moment in the advertising world. He was in charge of creating three of the top five commercials in USA Today’s ad meter rating.

All of Immesoete’s top-ranked spots were for Anheuser-Busch’s Bud Light: “Cedric/Date” was the most popular, while “Chow Down” with Otto the dog ranked fourth and “Pencil Pusher” came in fifth.

Modest to a fault, Immesoete is surprised his spots scored as well as they did. But the veteran ad exec, who came to DDB from Leo Burnett Co. six years ago, believes the top-ranked spot featuring Cedric the entertainer clicked with viewers for a reason. “It seemed to hit on a truth that a lot of people can relate to.”

Cedric, who appeared in the film “Kings of Comedy” and is well known as a stand-up comedian, was recommended to DDB by Anheuser-Busch executives. Immesoete and his team came up with about six possible scenarios for Cedric commercials, and AB execs selected the date-gone-awry howler for the Super Bowl.

Immesoete said fans of Cedric will have a chance to see him in more commercials as AB looks to capitalize on its new star’s popularity.

As for the rest of the ad competition on the Super Bowl, it was a mixed bag from Immesoete’s vantage.

He didn’t care for the Volkswagen spot where the car fell out of a tree. “Too quiet and too long for the Super Bowl,” he said. Though he liked the Bob Dole Pepsi commercial, Immesoete’s not sure Dole fits the soda pop’s target audience. “They usually go more youth-oriented,” he said.

Contact advertising/marketing columnist Lewis Lazare at llazare@suntimes.com.

Super Bowl, ‘Survivor’ Buoy CBS

http://news.excite.com/news/ap/010130/17/ent-nielsens

NEW YORK (AP) – The Super Bowl made the week’s television ratings race a runaway – sort of like the game itself.

CBS was the easy victor, Nielsen Media Research said Tuesday. The Baltimore Ravens’ 34-7 win over the New York Giants was one of the lowest-rated Super Bowls ever, but the game is still the most-watched TV event of the year.

The premiere of “Survivor II: The Australian Outback” after the game kept 45.3 million people tuned in to CBS. It was the most popular entertainment program so far this television season.

Less super for CBS was Ricky Martin’s Saturday night Super Bowl special, which finished tied for 74th place in the ratings.

For the week, CBS averaged 21.3 million viewers (12.0 rating, 19 share), ABC had 11.3 million viewers (7.7, 12), NBC had 10.5 million viewers (7.2, 11) and Fox had 9.4 million (5.9, 9). UPN had 3.9 million viewers (2.5, 4), the WB had 3.8 million (2.4, 4) and Pax TV had 1.3 million (0.9, 1).

NBC’s “Nightly News” won the evening news ratings race with an average of 11.1 million viewers (8.2 rating, 16 share). ABC’s “World News Tonight” finished second with 10.2 million viewers (7.8, 15) and the “CBS Evening News” averaged 9.6 million viewers (7.1, 13).

Lifetime Television celebrated a milestone by ranking first in prime-time ratings among all basic cable networks in January for the first time in its history.

A rating point represents 1,022,000 households, or 1 percent of the nation’s estimated 102.2 million TV homes. The share is the percentage of in-use televisions tuned to a given show.

For the week of Jan. 22-28, the top 10 shows, their networks and ratings: “Super Bowl XXXV: Baltimore vs. N.Y. Giants,” CBS, 40.4; “Super Bowl Post Game,” CBS, 28.8; “Survivor II,” CBS, 24.5; “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” (Wednesday), ABC, 13.5; “Law and Order,” NBC, 12.9; “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” (Thursday), ABC, 12.7; “The West Wing,” NBC, 12.3; “Friends,” NBC, 12.1; “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” (Friday), ABC, 11.5; “ER,” NBC, 11.4.

Television ratings suggest big game was Super Bore

http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis/web/vortex/display?slug=supe30&date=20010130

By Howard Fendrich

The Associated Press

NEW YORK – Too much defense, too many punts, too big a competitive gap between the teams.

Nothing seemed to go CBS Sports’ way during Sunday’s Super Bowl, dragging the television rating down to one of the event’s lowest in 30 years. The network’s bottom line won’t suffer, though.

The telecast of the Baltimore Ravens’ 34-7 victory over the New York Giants drew a 40.3 national rating with a record-low 60 share.

That means an average of 40.3 percent of the country’s TV homes were watching at any given moment, while 60 percent of in-use televisions were tuned to the game.

The lowest previous share for any Super Bowl was 61, in 1999 (on Fox) and in 1992 (the last time CBS televised the game).

The rating for the Ravens-Giants game was down 7 percent from last year’s Super Bowl on ABC, and slightly higher than the 40.2 for 1999, when the Denver Broncos beat the Atlanta Falcons 34-19.

The only other Super Bowl since 1971 with a lower rating was the 1990 game, which drew a 39.0 on CBS as the San Francisco 49ers smashed the Broncos 55-10.

Still, CBS estimates 131.2 million people watched at least part of the 2001 Super Bowl.

And the network had not promised a minimum rating to advertisers, who paid an average of more than $2 million per 30-second commercial.

“We’re absolutely thrilled from every standpoint, from the pregame to the game to halftime to the phenomenal amount of people who stuck around for `Survivor,’ ” said Sean McManus, president of CBS Sports. “Other than having some control over the score, I don’t think I would have done anything differently.”

Big sports events have been getting declining ratings lately.

The Sydney Games drew the worst ratings for an Olympics since 1968, while the World Series ratings were the lowest ever, and the NCAA men’s basketball title game dropped 18 percent from 1999, which was the previous low since CBS started airing the event in 1982.

The Super Bowl is often the most-watched TV program each year, and nine of the 15 highest-rated shows in history are NFL championship games. Sunday’s game doesn’t crack the top 50.

It didn’t get much of a boost from having a team from New York, where the rating was 40.9 – about average for the country’s largest markets. Tampa registered a 51.2, followed by Baltimore’s 49.1.

The overall drop from last year’s Super Bowl is not surprising.

Sunday’s game was decided by the third quarter, and ratings steadily declined during the last hour of the broadcast. The St. Louis Rams’ 23-16 victory over the Tennessee Titans in 2000 came down to the final play.

And while last year’s game featured the Rams’ big-play offense, neither Baltimore nor New York was particularly efficient when it had the ball. The teams combined for the fewest yards in a Super Bowl, and the game’s 21 punts shattered the old mark.

CBS continued to draw viewers after the on-field action ended, registering a 28.7 rating and 43 share for about 20 minutes of postgame coverage. The season premiere of “Survivor” followed, and drew a national rating of 23.6 with a 38 share.

Super Bowl Sends Net Traffic Soaring

http://news.excite.com/news/r/010130/12/net-superbowl-ratings-dc

NEW YORK (Reuters) – The number of people logging on to the official Super Bowl Web site, Superbowl.com, soared 269 percent on the day of the game, according to Internet audience measurement service Nielsen/NetRatings.

About 359,000 unique visitors logged on to the site on Sunday, compared to 97,000 visitors the day before, Nielsen/NetRatings said. It said that hour-by-hour traffic jumped in the fourth quarter of the game with 16 percent of all visitors logging on during that time to vote for the Super Bowl’s most valuable player.

In Sunday’s Super Bowl XXXV, the Baltimore Ravens crushed the New York Giants with a 34-7 score in a game that was watched by a total of about 131 million people in the United States.

Nielsen/NetRatings also said that the number of dot-com companies advertising during the game fell by a whopping 40 percent over last year’s game while traditional brick and mortar advertisers rose 18 percent.

“This is 180 degree different from the Super Bowl last year,” Allen Weiner, vice president of analytical services at NetRatings told Reuters.

Only three Internet companies ran advertisements in the Super Bowl this year — Web broker E+Trade (EGRP) and recruitment sites HotJobs.com (HOTJ) and Monster.com, a unit of TMP Worldwide (TMPW) — compared with 17 dot-com advertisers a year ago.

Super Bowl ad veterans PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) and Anheuser-Busch Cos. (BUD) dominated Sunday’s advertising spots.

“There really wasn’t anything that had a Web dimension,” Weiner said of Sunday’s Super Bowl ads. “They were more focusing on the actual product.”

Interactive Version of EDS Super Bowl Ad Scores With Viewers; Traffic to eds.com Nearly Triples

http://www.newswire.ca/releases/January2001/30/c3358.html

Attention Business And Technology Editors:

TORONTO /CNW/ — Traffic on www.eds.com is nearly triple last year’s Super Bowl record as more than one million football fans continue to log on to an interactive version of EDS’s (NYSE: EDS) quirky television commercial, Running with the Squirrels.

A global technology services provider, EDS is receiving high marks from viewers with its parody of Spain’s famous Running of the Bulls. The commercial was featured recently in the Toronto Star and the Globe and Mail, as well as on Global TV and ROB-TV’s The Bottom Line. It is also among the highest rated business-to-business advertisements on the USA Today Super Bowl Ad Meter. Squirrels received strong support on www.washingtonpost.com and USA Today’s online poll.

“We are pleased with the response from Super Bowl fans in Canada and elsewhere around the world,” said James Toccacelli, vice-president, communications, at EDS Canada. “This bodes very well for our creating a metaphor communicating the importance of businesses becoming more agile in today’s Digital Economy. EDS understands these complexities and is prepared to help clients capture opportunities.”

The comical advertisement substitutes squirrels for bulls to make the point that EDS can help companies concerned about quick, agile competitors at their heels in the Digital Economy. The online version, Clicking with the Squirrels, provides a behind-the-scenes look at the commercial, with squirrel facts and links to case studies demonstrating how EDS helps clients achieve success in the Digital Economy.

With more than one million hits, eds.com almost tripled last year’s Super Bowl Sunday traffic when Squirrels’ award-winning predecessor, Herding Cats, was first aired.

EDS in Canada is the country’s leading global services company, providing strategy, implementation and hosting for clients managing the business and technology complexities of the digital economy. The company’s 8,300 professionals bring together the world’s best technologies to address critical client business imperatives. It helps clients eliminate boundaries, collaborate in new ways, establish their customers’ trust and continuously seek improvement. EDS services the world’s leading companies and governments in 55 countries globally through its four lines of business: A.T. Kearney, Business Process Management, E.solutions and Information Solutions. EDS reported revenues of $18.5 billion in 1999. The company’s stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange. Learn more at www.eds.com.

For more information please contact James Toccacelli at (416) 814-4637, or james.toccacellieds.com.

For further information: James Toccacelli of Electronic Data Systems Corporation, 416-814-4637, or james.toccacelli@eds.com /Web site: http://www.washingtonpost.com http://www.eds.com