Tag Archives: 2003

Watch the top Super Bowl Commercials from the past 15 years


Watch the Top Five Super Bowl Commercials from the past fifteen years (yes, Feb. 3 marks the 16th anniversary of our coverage of your favorite Super Bowl Commercials – SuperBowl-ads.com)

TNS Media Intelligence Reports Super Bowl Spending Reached $2.17 Billion over the Past 20 Years

finance.yahoo.com

Historical Advertising Data Showcases Super Bowl’s Leading Spenders, Quadrupled Ad Rates and More Cluttered Air Time

Press Release Source: TNS Media Intelligence On Monday January 11, 2010, 8:00 am EST

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The escalating chatter surrounding Super Bowl XLIV is not just about the teams competing for the 2010 championship. The TV commercials that will appear during the game are also the subject of discussion and speculation. And participating advertisers will once again be confronted with the difficult question of whether the Super Bowl is a smart marketing investment or a wasted use of the budget.

TNS Media Intelligence has again combed through its extensive database to report on the past 20 years of Super Bowl advertising. From 1990 thru 2009, the Super Bowl game has generated $2.17 billion of network sales from a total of 210 different advertisers and more than 1,400 commercial messages.

“The Super Bowl remains a singular event for engaging the broadest number of consumers at one time,” said Mark Nesbitt, President, TNS Media Intelligence. “Because it is viewed live and experienced by a majority of the country at the same time, a commercial presence on the broadcast has great significance and impact for a brand, making each not so much a brand message as a brand event. It is why a presence on the broadcast lends itself so effectively to an integrated marketing effort.”

“As an advertising event, the Super Bowl has evolved beyond a vehicle for presenting expensive, stand-alone commercial spots that seek to entertain viewers and generate awareness,” said Jon Swallen, SVP Research for TNS Media Intelligence. “Increasingly, in-game spots are being supplemented by elaborate integrated communications programs that attempt to drive traffic online or in-store, generate positive social media discussion, incorporate public relations effort and ultimately achieve a strong ROI.”

Top Five Super Bowl Advertisers

The top five Super Bowl advertisers of the past 20 years have spent $783 million on advertising during the game, accounting for 36 percent of total advertising revenue. Anheuser-Busch and PepsiCo, which have appeared in every game during this period, lead the pack, followed by General Motors, Walt Disney and Time Warner.

TOP 5 SUPER BOWL ADVERTISERS

1990-2009

Rank

Advertiser

# of Years With
Ads In Game

Ad Spend
($ millions)

1 Anheuser-Busch 20 $ 311.8
2 PepsiCo 20 $ 254.2
3 General Motors 15 $ 80.5
4 Walt Disney 10 $ 71.6
5 Time Warner 12 $ 64.8
Top 5 Total $ 783.0
Source: TNS Media Intelligence

Although Pepsi soft drinks will not be advertised in this year’s game, ending a 23-year streak, the PepsiCo parent company will still be represented by its Frito-Lay snack food division. General Motors will be absent from the game for the second year in a row. Prior to dropping out in 2009, GM had advertised in 11 of the previous 12 Super Bowls.

The Price of Advertising

The cost of a 30-second advertisement in the Super Bowl has more than quadrupled in the past 20 years and reached $3 million in 2009. The recessionary environment is expected to yield lower pricing for the 2010 game, with CBS reportedly selling 30-second units for between $2.5 and $2.8 million.

The amount paid by individual marketers will vary depending on where the ad runs in the game, how much commercial time is purchased and whether the advertiser opts for a larger package that includes spots in the pre-game and/or post-game coverage.

SUPER BOWL ADVERTISING:

RATES AND REVENUE 1990-2009

Year

Cost :30 Unit
($000)

Total Ad Revenue
($ millions)

1990 700 39.0
1995 1,150 69.7
2000 2,100 135.1
2005 2,400 159.2
2006 2,500 162.5
2007 2,385 153.7
2008 2,700 186.3
2009 3,000 213.0
Source: TNS Media Intelligence

First Time Advertisers

Since 2005, the annual Super Bowl ad lineup has had between 30 and 35 different companies. First-time advertisers are accounting for 20-25 percent of the ad roster. The ad time vacated by such long-time sponsors as FedEx, General Motors and Pepsi is being taken over by other companies eager for the recognition and brand-building opportunity of the Super Bowl stage.

The first-time advertisers in the 2009 game were Cash4Gold.com, Castrol, Denny’s, Teleflora and Vizio. For the 2010 contest, the rookie lineup is expected to include Electronic Arts and HomeAway, among others.

NUMBER OF SUPER BOWL ADVERTISERS BY YEAR

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

All Advertisers 34 32 30 32 30
First-Timers 9 8 7 7 5
Source: TNS Media Intelligence

More Advertising, More Clutter

Over the past ten years, the volume of commercial time in the game has been edging upwards even as the price of advertising has become more expensive. The NBC telecast of the 2009 Super Bowl contained a record 45 minutes, 5 seconds of network ads. This included paying sponsors, commercial messages from the NFL, plus “house ads” aired by CBS to promote its own shows.

Source: TNS Media Intelligence

Top Super Bowl Advertising Categories

What kinds of products are most frequently advertised on the Super Bowl? The popular perception is that beer, soft drinks and autos are the prime ad categories, given their annual presence in the game.

Actually, the leader by dollar value is promotional advertising from the network itself. In a typical Super Bowl, 15-20 percent of all commercial time is a plug by the network for its own programming. In 2009, the value of this air time exceeded $42 million.

Network Promotions In The Super Bowl

Time
(mm:ss)

% of All Ad
Time

Value
($ millions)

2006 7:20 16.6% $36.7
2007 9:35 22.2% $46.7
2008 7:55 18.2% $42.8
2009 7:05 15.7% $42.5
Source: TNS Media Intelligence

“The Super Bowl offers the host network an attractive platform to promote its upcoming programming and try to build an audience,” added Swallen. “In deciding how much ad time to keep for itself, the network has to assess the trade-off between giving up current revenue in the game versus building future revenue from its other programming.”

Over the past decade, the Super Bowl has attracted a bevy of different movie studio, automotive and dot-com companies, making them the most populous and competitive ad categories.

Number of Super Bowl Advertisers By Category

Category

2000

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Auto Manufacturers 2 5 4 3 4 3
Dot-com 14 3 4 5 5 9
Motion Pictures 4 6 4 3 6 4
Source: TNS Media Intelligence

How Big is the Super Bowl Versus Other Sport Franchises?

The Major League Baseball’s World Series and the NCAA Men’s Basketball Championship are two other high profile sporting events that attract significant interest from TV advertisers. But how do these compare to the Super Bowl in terms of ad spend?

The World Series is four to seven games. March Madness peaks with the semi-finals and championship on its final weekend, a total of three games. The Super Bowl, of course, is a single telecast. In recent years, the Super Bowl and World Series have been running neck and neck in total ad spending. In 2009, baseball pulled slightly ahead as the Fall Classic went to a sixth game for the first time since 2003.

MAJOR SPORTING CHAMPIONSHIPS

NETWORK TV AD REVENUE ($ MILLIONS)

Super Bowl
Game

World Series
(# games)

NCAA Basketball
Men’s Final Four
(# games)

2005 $158.4 $146.9 (4) $142.2 (3)
2006 $162.5 $160.8 (5) $154.7 (3)
2007 $151.5 $156.6 (4) $168.4 (3)
2008 $182.3 $176.2 (5) $177.9 (3)
2009 $213.0 $223.6 (6) $163.2 (3)
Source: TNS Media Intelligence

About TNS Media

Established in more than 30 countries, TNS Media explores all media – print, radio, TV, Internet, social media, cinema and outdoor worldwide, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and offers a full range of insights, analyses and audience measurement services.

TNS Media combines the deepest expertise in the industry to provide media and marketing intelligence including advertising expenditure monitoring, advertising creation monitoring, audience measurement, market influence analytics, online consumer behavior tracking, news monitoring, sports sponsorship evaluation and more. The TNS Media companies track more than 3 million brands and provide vital market intelligence to 16,000 customers around the world. For further information, please visit www.tnsmediagroup.com.

About Kantar

Kantar is one of the world’s largest insight, information and consultancy networks. By uniting the diverse talents of its 13 specialist companies, the group aims to become the pre-eminent provider of compelling and inspirational insights for the global business community. Its 26,500 employees work across 95 countries and across the whole spectrum of research and consultancy disciplines, enabling the group to offer clients business insights at each and every point of the consumer cycle. The group’s services are employed by over half of the Fortune Top 500 companies.

For further information, please visit us at www.kantar.com.

The sleaziest Super Bowl ads of all time

A farting horse, money out the wazoo, and — of course — GoDaddy.com

Image: Bud Light Commercial
Bud Light prepares to ruin a beautiful moment, and steal an idea from “Seinfeld.”
Anheiser-Busch  

By Peter Hartlaub
msnbc.com contributor

When it comes to Super Bowl advertisements, sleaze sells. This Sunday will likely feature sexual innuendos, bodily functions, crotch injuries, erectile dysfunction talk and various combinations of the four.

 Tawdry commercials have been around from the beginning — the first memorable Super Bowl ad featured Farrah Fawcett making love to Joe Namath’s face with Noxzema shaving cream — but the risk-taking definitely increased beginning in the mid-1990s. The sleaziest Super Bowl by far was in 2004, which was also the year that Janet Jackson’s right breast made an unfortunate halftime appearance. 

 Below are the Top 10 sleaziest advertisements in Super Bowl history. We’re taking the broadest definition of the word, including all forms of vulgarity, from splattering bird poop to mud-wrestling bimbos.

 You can decide whether sleaziness in Super Bowl commercials is a good or bad thing. It’s worth noting that most of these ads drew the ire of critics — but were very well-received by the public.

   

 

Image: "Out of the Wahzoo" commercial

E*Trade “Money out the Wazoo” (2000): The ad consists of a man being wheeled through a busy emergency room, in obvious pain, as various physicians and nurses stare up his rectal cavity and say thing like “Doctor, I think you should see this … he has money coming out of the wazoo!”

 Was it funny? Actually, it was pretty hilarious. Imagine if the “South Park” guys directed an episode of “ER.”

 Norwegian “There is No Law” (1994): This humorless cruise line ad may have been shot in classy black and white, but the content looked like a “Sex and the City” episode. “There is no law that says you can’t make love at 4 in the afternoon on a Tuesday,” the commercial begins. From there, a naked dude climbs in a hammock. A second ad features people in the shower making out.

 Was it funny? Your employer’s sexual harassment training video was funnier than this spot.

 Noxzema “Joe Namath” (1973): The New York Jets quarterback looks at the camera and exclaims, “I’m so excited, I’m going to get creamed,” before Farrah Fawcett spreads Noxzema shaving lotion across his face with near-pornographic passion. The word “creamed” is repeated twice more for effect.

 Was it funny? No, but this was filmed in 1973, when people still thought Jerry Lewis was amusing.

   

 

Image: Nissan Pigeons commerical

Nissan “Pigeons” (1997): A squadron of pigeons sets its sights on a Nissan sedan, hoping to pelt it with bird droppings. As “Danger Zone” from the “Top Gun” soundtrack plays, they defecate on everything in sight, but miss their intended target.

Bonus sleaze points: For having the birds ruin a wedding, with a very clear shot of white poop landing in a punch bowl.

Was it funny? Bird feces or no bird feces, this was still one of the more amusing ads of the year — if not the decade.

Victoria’s Secret “Fashion Show” (1999): Advertising for a web-only lingerie fashion show, scores of scantily-clad models traipse in front of the camera. “The Broncos won’t be there. The Falcons won’t be there,” the text scrolling by says. “You won’t care.” Victoria’s Secret later claims 1.2 million visitors to its web site. (A 30-second ad in 1999 cost $1.6 million.)

Was it funny? Not even remotely, although to be fair it wasn’t trying to be.

  

 

Image: GoDaddy.com proceedings

GoDaddy.com “Proceedings” (2005): One year after Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction, “Go Daddy Girl” Nikki Cappelli appears before a shocked Congress, as her tank top strap keeps breaking. One politician has to reach for his oxygen.

Bonus sleaze points: For the pandering GoDaddy executives, who are probably mad that this entry didn’t rank higher on the list.

Was it funny? Not very. The whole GoDaddy “look at us, we’re controversial!” shtick was tired from the beginning.

Cialis “Will You Be Ready?” (2004): The visuals in this advertisement for erectile dysfunction medicine weren’t especially racy, but it featured the 10 most shocking words in the history of the Super Bowl: “Erections lasting longer than four hours may require medical help.”

Bonus sleaze points: The ad was followed by a spot from competitor Levitra, which featured the not-so-subtle sexually-charged image of Mike Ditka throwing a football through a tire.

Was it funny? It probably wasn’t intentional, but these were the funniest ads of the year.

  

 

Image: Bud Light commercial - Upside Down Clown

Budweiser “Upside Down Clown” (2003): A man in an inverted clown suit walks in a bar, orders a beer and drinks it through a hole in the costume’s crotch. To the bar patrons (and viewers at home) he appears to be pouring the beverage into his rectum.

Bonus sleaze points: For letting the guy order a hot dog after the beer is gone.

Was it funny? Yes. Did it make people want to drink Budweiser, or much of anything for the next few days? Doubtful.

 

  

 

Image: Bud ad
Anheiser-busch
It’s one thing to steal from Seinfeld, but it’s another thing to be so gross about it.

 

 


Bud Light “Sleigh” (2004): A man and woman are riding in a Hansom cab. When the man lights a candle for mood, the horse lifts its tail and farts, torching the girlfriend. In a year where sleazy ads were scrutinized by critics, this was one was almost always mentioned first.

Bonus sleaze points: For giving the boyfriend the one-liner, “Do you smell barbecue?”

Was it funny? It depends if you saw the “Seinfeld” episode where the idea was borrowed from.

via msnbc.msn.com

Super Bowl ads are a sign of the times

The best years for spots are ones where economy, country is thriving

Image: Super Bowl ad
Advertisers steered clear of any funny ads in 2002. But this Budweiser spot where the Clydesdales gaze at the New York City skyline is memorable. 
   

Strong economic times can result in a bounty of good Super Bowl ads. Janet Jackson’s exposed breast is a Super Bowl commercial killer. And venture capitalist money equals offbeat and funny — at least when it comes to the memorable dot-com advertisements of the late 1990s and 2000.

 That was arguably the best era for Super Bowl ads, but there were other boom times as well — which, coincidence or not, often seem to come when confidence in the economy is rising. The landmark Apple “1984” commercial highlighted one of the best Super Bowls for ad-watchers, and the Reaganomics-fueled years that followed were stocked with plenty of clever spots as well.

 There’s no formula to determine for sure whether this year’s Super Bowl ads will be hilarious or horrible. But if you look at what’s going on in the country right now, you might get at least part of your answer.

 “Every year it really does mirror the biggest trends that year — what’s happening in the economy and what’s happening in the culture,” said Barbara Lippert, an Adweek advertising critic. “(During) one of the years that seemed to be a recession year in the 1990s, there were suddenly lots of commercials about home offices. Staples and others joined the pack, because suddenly everyone was a consultant from home.”

 In terms of quality, history shows that morally and socially cautious times seem to be bad for viewers. Arguably the worst ads in recent years came during Super Bowl XXXIX in 2005, the year following Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction.” Super Bowl XXXVI in 2002, the year after the Sept. 11 attacks, was also forgettable — except for a spot where the Budweiser Clydesdales knelt down facing the empty space where the Twin Towers stood.

 The first dotcom boom was anything but cautious, and the results were creative, often self-deprecating (the E*Trade “Well we just wasted $2 million bucks. What are you doing with your money” ad) and occasionally very funny. 

 “There were a couple of years there — 1998, 1999 and 2000 — where the landscape of ads were unlike any we have ever seen before, or have seen since,” said Steve Hall, an advertising and marketing veteran who founded Adrants.com. “You had advertisers like Cisco and other high technology companies that you would never imagine would spend that kind of money. You had advertisers on there who no longer exist.”

 Below are arguably the five best years for Super Bowl ads — based on popularity of the advertisements with audiences, not the success of the companies that paid for them.

 

Image: Superbowl Ad

5. The year: 1984

 Highlights include: Apple “1984”; McDonalds “Meat N’ Potatoes”

 The breakdown: Employment numbers were finally on the rise again, and so was the quality of these ads. Viewers remember the Ridley Scott-directed “1984” ad for the Apple MacIntosh, but there were other fun entries — including a couple of clever McDonald’s ads plus an always reliable Master Lock bullet spot. Celebrity appearances were particularly interesting this year, with Bill Bixby shilling for Radio Shack and Alan Alda selling game consoles for Atari.  

 

  Discuss: What’s your favorite Super Bowl ad?

 

Image: Super Bowl ad

4. The year 1999

Highlights include: Monster.com “When I Grow Up”; Budweiser “Dalmatians Separated at Birth”

The breakdown: As the dotcom money started pouring in, Monster.com’s hilarious kid-themed spot (“When I grow up, I want to be forced into early retirement …”) made everyone forget bad entries by HotJobs and Buy.com. Anheuser Busch also had one of its best years, featuring a doomed lobster that holds a bottle of Bud Light hostage and a simple-yet-effective checkout aisle spot featuring two slackers who have to choose between toilet paper and a six-pack. The Victoria Secret Web-only fashion show was a success of sorts — the site crashed because of too much traffic.

 

Image: Super Bowl ad

3. The year: 1995

Highlights include: Budweiser “Frogs”; Pepsi “Diner”; Pepsi “Sucked In”

The breakdown: The “Bud … wise … errrrr” frog ads were the audience favorite in this solid lineup from the heart of the Clinton era. But there were other successes as well, including a clever Doritos spot playing off Texas Gov. Ann Richards and New York Gov. Mario Cuomo’s political differences (“Mmmm. These are so good, I think I’ll eat them liberally”). Pepsi had a great lineup, with a Pepsi and Coke distributor who try to find peace in a diner, a boy who gets sucked into a Pepsi bottle and a clever spot with a frustrating vending machine bill changer.

 

Image: Super Bowl ad

2. The year: 2003

Highlights include: Reebok “Terry Tate Office Linebacker”; FedEx “Castaway”; Budweiser “Horse Football Instant Replay.”

The breakdown: A year and a half removed from the Sept. 11 attacks and a year before the “Nipplegate” fiasco, advertisers were having fun again. “Terry Tate Office Linebacker” and the FedEx lampoon of the Tom Hanks film “Castaway” got the biggest laughs, and there were many effective celebrity ads – including Willie Nelson for H&R Block, a surprisingly humorous Yao Ming for Visa and several increasingly funny Pepsi Twist spots with Ozzy Osbourne and his family – who move in next to the Osmonds.

 

Image: Super Bowl ad

1. The year: 2000

Highlights include: EDS “Cat Herders”; E*Trade “Wasted $2 Million”; Mountain Dew “Bad Cheetah”

The breakdown: Irrational exuberance has its advantages. Emboldened by the success of Monster.com’s 1999 ad, more than 15 dot-commers participated – and they were willing to go places that traditional Super Bowl ad powerhouses such as Budweiser and Pepsi would never venture. E*Trade’s famous “We just wasted $2 million bucks …” ad was a keeper, but even the bad ones this year were pretty interesting. (Remember that trippy Pets.com hand puppet-themed “If You Leave Me Now” spot?) “Cat Herders” from EDS was another classic.

via msnbc.msn.com

Even Rookie Advertisers Feel Big-Game Pressure

By SUZANNE VRANICA and STEPHANIE KANG

Super Bowl viewers will be on the lookout for rookie mistakes — and not just on the field.

Advertising at the big game is a gamble for newcomers not just because of the rising cost of buying the ads — advertisers are paying up to $2.7 million for a 30-second spot this year, up from $2.6 million in 2007 — but also the risk to their reputations if the commercials fall flat or offend.
[Under Armour's Super Bowl spot may feature Nascar driver Carl Edwards.]

Under Armour’s Super Bowl spot may feature Nascar driver Carl Edwards.

As of yesterday, all but one of the 63 spots for the Feb. 3 Super Bowl XLII had been sold. In recent years, the lineup has typically included between six and 10 new advertisers, and News Corp.‘s Fox is expecting around 10 this year, according to a person familiar with the matter. Among the first-timers joining perennial Super Bowl marketers like PepsiCo Inc. and FedEx Corp. this year are athletic-apparel maker Under Armour Inc., online car sales site Cars.com and Unilever‘s hair-care brand Sunsilk, Procter & Gamble Co.’s Tide and Bridgestone Corp.’s Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire unit.

This year’s newbies, three of whom are using the event to launch campaigns, say they have a few tricks up their sleeves. Cars.com, for example, is using an ad team from Omnicom Group Inc.’s DDB Chicago that was behind many of the wildly popular Bud Light commercials. Under Armour’s 60-second spot, meanwhile, will feature sports personalities in extreme-training conditions, the company says. While the ad isn’t completed yet, images may include National Football League player Vernon Davis dragging a tractor tire, figure skater Kimmie Meissner leaping over exhaust pipes, or Nascar driver Carl Edwards doing lunges holding a cement block.

While the Super Bowl ads are inevitably rated on their creativity and cool factor, some marketers say those elements are less important to them than getting out their message clearly.However, over the years, plenty of companies have fumbled their Super Bowl advertising debuts. A 1999 spot for Just for Feet, a now-defunct athletic shoe and sportswear retailer, featured a band of mostly white commandos in a Humvee chasing a barefoot African man in the jungle and forcing him to wear Nike sneakers. The ad was labeled racist, and Just for Feet later sued the agency that created the spot, Saatchi & Saatchi. The next year, financial-services company John Nuveen ran a spot that, with the help of digital photography, showed paralyzed actor Christopher Reeve walking — an ad many viewers found unsettling.
[Graphic]

Those ads came during the dot-com boom, when advertisers hungering to take their companies public were desperate to get Wall Street’s attention. One of the biggest years for new marketers in the Super Bowl was 2000, known in ad circles as the “dot-com bowl.” Among the rookies that year were AutoTrader, OnMoney.com, OurBeginning.com, Computer.com and Kforce.com. While many first-time Super Bowl advertisers return, many of the companies in the class of 2000 eventually went bust.

Today, fallout from an ill-conceived ad can be magnified by the growing number of polls that survey the public about ads and Web sites that critique commercials. That heightened scrutiny causes some advertisers to think twice about taking the Super Bowl plunge. “There are a lot of polls out there now, and advertisers don’t want bad press,” says Andy Donchin, director for national broadcast at Carat USA, a media-buying firm owned by Aegis Group PLC.

Another hazard for first-timers: being outshone by the veterans. Only a fraction of the dozens of ads that will air during the game will get any significant buzz the next day, and companies like Cars.com and Under Armour are competing against regulars like Anheuser-Busch Cos., who have Super Bowl ads down to a science. The brewer features 10 different spots during the game, all of which it tests via focus groups.

“It’s hard to outdo Anheuser-Busch and Pepsi,” says Bruce Vanden Bergh, an advertising professor at Michigan State University.

Still the big game is tempting to advertisers looking to launch products, kick off ad campaigns or introduce a new company name. It is the single biggest television event of the year, with 90 million viewers in the U.S., plus large numbers of people in 230 other countries and territories. In an age of audience fragmentation, companies have few such opportunities to reach large numbers of viewers in a single venue.

Some companies decide to advertise in the Super Bowl for the first time because they’re overshadowed by bigger players in their industry and want to address that imbalance. Others are diversifying and want to draw attention to that foray. Baltimore-based Under Armour made a name for itself in 1996 with its line of sweat-wicking performance apparel. Now it’s taking another shot at established companies like Nike and Adidas with its ad campaign announcing its entry into the cross-training shoe market.

Under Armour’s spot this year, which will air in the first quarter of the game, represents a sizable chunk of the company’s advertising budget, which was $16 million last year, according to TNS Media Intelligence.

“There is no bigger opportunity” than the Super Bowl, says Under Armour’s Chief Executive Kevin Plank. “This is a defining time for our brand,” he adds. “We are now ready to compete in footwear.”

Cars.com will use the Super Bowl to kick off an ad campaign that introduces the tagline “Confidence comes standard.” Its spot shows consumers going to a car dealership armed with research from Cars.com. The ads have a humorous surprise ending showing what the consumer would have done if he hadn’t had the Cars.com research.

Bridgestone, which is also sponsoring the game’s halftime show, had its agency come up with concepts for 140 different commercials, which Bridgestone narrowed down to three now being produced. The tire maker will select two spots to air during the game. The company says it is using ad formulas that have worked for other companies in the past: animals, humor and celebrities — in this case, Alice Cooper and Richard Simmons.

Tide is considering airing an old ad for its Tide to Go pen that shows a man interviewing for a job who is repeatedly interrupted by a talking stain on his shirt, according to people familiar with the matter. The spot won a Silver Lion Award last year at the annual International Advertising Festival in Cannes, France.

Meanwhile, Sunsilk is betting on Madonna, Shakira and Marilyn Monroe, showing images of the women while their music plays. The screen reads: “Some girls can’t wait to make life happen. Their hair tells their story.” After the Super Bowl, the company’s high-energy spot will be rolled out in 14 countries.

Some Super Bowl first timers have scored big. Monster.com debuted in 1999 with a hit ad featuring kids talking about what they wanted to be when they grow up. In 2006 Unilever ran an ad for Dove showing young girls talking about their looks that was widely praised for its emotional depth.

One of last year’s newcomers, Garmin Ltd., the maker of GPS devices, is coming back this year despite coming in low on some ad poll lists with an ad featuring a map that turned into a Godzilla-inspired monster. Reaction “was a mixed bag but it was still a success,” says Ted Gartner, media relations manager at Garmin. “As long as people are spelling our name right and still purchasing the Garmin units, it’s all good.”

via online.wsj.com

Ad Track: Pepsi hopes Earnhardt drives laps around A-B

By Theresa Howard, USA TODAY
NEW YORK — NASCAR superstar Dale Earnhardt Jr. will go bumper-to-bumper with his former backer before the Feb. 17 Daytona 500 if he makes the starting grid in a Feb. 3 Super Bowl ad for the company sponsoring his new ride.

Earnhardt, a five-time Most Popular Driver Award winner whose 17 major victories include the 2004 Daytona 500, recently shot two ads for Pepsi’s (PEP) Amp energy drink, sponsor of his race car this year.

Pepsi is the No. 2 Super Bowl ad spender this year behind Anheuser-Busch (BUD), which was Earnhardt’s sponsor last season. He moved to Pepsi and the Hendrick Motorsports racing team after a highly publicized split with his family’s team and says he’s eager to help Pepsi overtake marketing rival A-B as a Super Bowl ad favorite.

“There’s only a few Super Bowl spots and it’s limited on what celebrities get chosen; after a while, you start to understand the competition between the brands,” Earnhardt said by phone from a commercial shoot in Los Angeles, where he said he and a crew of 30 took over a “nice woman’s café.”

“You start to see how big a deal it is not to bomb,” he said. “It’s important to be at the top of the list. When they go out and spend all this dang money, they don’t want to bomb out.”

Pepsi shot two ads with the NASCAR star and they’re in a pool of ads in testing to see which will get a piece of its two minutes of in-game ad time. With that time valued at about $10 million and more than 90 million people expected to be watching, Pepsi is testing to see if they are game-ready. Either way, the Earnhardt ads will air in the telecast of the Daytona 500.

But Pepsi and Earnhardt hope his ads will help them to a Super Bowl victory lap in USA TODAY’s 20th annual Ad Meter real-time rating of the ads on game day.

Pepsi marketers think Earnhardt’s appeal can help the Amp ads top soft-drink rival Coca-Cola and end Anheuser-Busch’s Super Bowl Ad Meter winning streak. A-B has taken the checkered flag for the most-liked ad for nine games. Before Anheuser-Busch began its Ad Meter run, Pepsi reigned as king of Big Game ads for six consecutive Super Sundays.

With the Earnhardt ads, Pepsi’s formula has mixed in some of the traditional ingredients of crowd-pleasing Super Bowl ads: celebrity star power and animal antics. In one of the ads, Amp gives Earnhardt the energy to take on a camel (real), in the other a gorilla (human powered). The beasts are meant to represent the forces that drivers endure on a race track at 200 mph.

The bottom line, of course, for Amp marketers is not winning prizes, but raising awareness and sales for the now-No. 5 energy drink brand.

“Energy is a huge growth category,” says Cie Nicholson, senior vice president and chief marketing officer for Pepsi North America. “We’re excited about Dale Jr. He’s one of the most popular athletes on the planet. There’s so much focus on Junior right now. We think it’s going to be a great year to take advantage of the excitement around Dale. Jr. and NASCAR in general.”

To that end, Earnhardt’s ads are just the start of the year-long marketing calendar for his new sponsor. He’ll be in print and radio ads and on Amp cans this summer.

NEW & NOTABLE

Pimp my flush.

One lucky queen will get a new throne this spring — a bathroom throne that is. To woo the gender that most frequently makes plumbing service calls, Roto-Rooter is launching a “Pimped Out Powder Room” sweepstakes. From Jan. 22 to April 1, visitors to rotorooter.com can register for a chance to win a remodeled bathroom worth $5,000 that comes with a new toilet, pedicure footbath, heated towel rack, flat-screen TV and DVD player. The winner will be crowned on April 25, National Plumber’s Day.

Sweet talk.

Wonder what the forecast is for your love life on Valentine’s Day? The company that makes Sweethearts treats makes some predictions with new sayings on the heart-shaped candy: Sun Shine, In a Fog, Chill Out and Heat Wave.

The expressions highlight the “unpredictability of day-to-day change of weather and people’s love lives,” explains Lory Zimbalatti, marketing manager at New England Confectionery.

Naked ambition.

What happens when one publicity stunt piggybacks another? In Manhattan, they both win. Earlier this month, Time Square’s infamous Naked Cowboy (Robert Burck), who strums guitar tunes in his briefs for baffled tourists, suddenly found himself with a warm coat on his bare shoulders.

The coat landed courtesy of Freddie Stollmack, founder of Weatherproof Garment, who was aiming for free PR for his $185 Ultra Tech men’s jacket. Stollmack declines to say who he’ll put under wraps next. How about Donald Trump’s hair?

Big Game hunting.

Looking for bang for your Super Bowl ad buck? Feature an unlikely celebrity in a creative ad, then reveal the punch line before the game, advises Jim Nail, chief strategy and marketing officer at buzz-tracking company Cymfony.

That strategy paid off last year for Nationwide Mutual Insurance, which featured Britney Spears’ ex, Kevin Federline, in its ad. The insurer let the world know K-Fed was on board in mid-January, then posted the ad online a week before the game. According to Cymfony, K-Fed beat other Super Bowl ad stars such as Sheryl Crow (Revlon) (REV) and Jessica Simpson (a pregame spot for Pizza Hut) (YUM) to get the most positive buzz in media such as newspapers, TV and the Web.

Among this year’s ads, Nail says a possible Justin Timberlake Pepsi ad already is getting a boatload of buzz.

Pepsi hasn’t made it official that he’s in, but fans seem to be salivating over what would be JT’s first Big Game appearance since his pivotal role in Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction” in the 2004 halftime.

Reebok’s Super Bowl hit.

Fictional linebacker Terry Tate, at 6-foot-7 and 320 pounds, made a big hit in a 2003 Super Bowl ad for Reebok. The spot featured Tate as the Office Linebacker, who enforced office rules such as no goofing off and no personal calls. In the Super Bowl ad, the hulking enforcer took down a worker sneaking in a game of computer solitaire.

We asked readers for favorite Super Bowl ads, and Lloyd Kinlaw, 34, of Longview, Texas, raved about that ad and other Tate commercials that followed: “(They) cracked me up like no other commercials. Tate just wrecks his co-workers out of the blue!”

via usatoday.printthis.clickability.com

The 10 best Super Bowl ads of all time – Business of Super Bowl

Article updated for 2008 msnbc.msn.com

Thirty-four years ago this month, Farrah Fawcett sensuously applied Noxzema to Joe Namath’s manly chin — touching off an escalating arms race of expensive Super Bowl commercials that have frequently been more entertaining than the games.

Last year, advertisers weren’t shy about spending $2.5 million on a 30-second commercial, but only the Budweiser “Magic Fridge” commercial came within striking distance of our Top 10 list.

Below are the best Super Bowl commercials of all time, the keys to their success and the prospects of the company after the spot aired. As you can see, just because people are still talking about an ad more than 20 years later doesn’t mean the product changed the world:

10. Budweiser “Frogs” (1995):
Three frogs, perched on a log outside a bar, croaking, “Bud … Weis … Errrrrr.”

What worked: The fact that Budweiser milks every commercial concept to death – does anyone doubt there will be a “Magic Fridge 2” this year? — makes it easy to forget how cool this ad was when you first heard it. The buildup was great, with an oddly infectious catchphrase.

The results: For better or worse, the frog ads and the spin-off lizard commercials made Budweiser — which was starting to become an old-guy drink — cool again for younger partiers.

9. Xerox “Monks” (1977): Faced with a hopelessly mundane copying job, Brother Dominic puts down his quill pen and turns to a Xerox 9200 duplicating system.

What worked: “Monks” seems a bit dated now, like watching NBA video from the early 1950s. But this was the George Mikan of early Super Bowl commercials, with a narrative style and series of punch lines that set the pioneering tone for hundreds of ads that followed.

The results: The promise to reproduce documents “at an incredible two pages per second” may not seem impressive now, but Xerox is now used as both a noun and a verb – the definition of a successful brand.

8. Tabasco “Mosquito” (1998): A mosquito tries to draw blood from a Tabasco-loving yokel — with explosive results.

What worked: The commercial was simple, funny and violent. With no dialogue, no music and only two characters (including the exploding insect), Tabasco memorably promoted its brand.

The results: Tabasco still hasn’t replaced ketchup in the condiment market, and probably never will. With its huge loyal following, does Tabasco even need commercials?

7. Electronic Data Systems “Herding Cats” (2000): A “Bonanza”-like family of cat herders talk about life on the range.

What worked: Kitties and cowboys made this a favorite for both kids and adults, but the near-seamless special effects were the real MVP. Advertiser EDS came back a year later with a similar formula, featuring the “Running of the Squirrels.”

The results: We still don’t know what EDS does, but it has 117,000 employees and just signed a $1.27 billion contract extension with the British Ministry of Defense — so the ad certainly didn’t hurt the company.

6. McDonald’s “The Showdown” (1993): Michael Jordan and Larry Bird engage in a physics-defying hoops-shooting contest for a Big Mac and fries.

What worked: Every basketball fan knows that Bird would win this contest 10 out of 10 times, but it was still a clever idea with a catchphrase that continues to pop up in “Horse” games. (“Over the second rafter, off the floor … nothing but net.”)

The results: This commercial seems to have blessed everyone involved. Jordan won three more championships and Bird transitioned into a solid career as a coach. And while salads and chicken products have been killing off the rest of the menu, the cholesterol-heavy Big Mac value meal remains an untouchable fast-food staple.

5. Monster.com “When I Grow Up …” (1999): A group of kids stare at the camera and declare their desire to “have a brown nose,” “be a yes man” and “claw my way up to middle management.” 

What worked: Kids are cute, and even cuter when reciting lines such as, “When I grow up … I want to be forced into early retirement.” It was great brand recognition for the new company.

The results: Monster survived the dot-com implosion and despite a stock controversy in 2006 has become a prosperous company that employs close to 5,000 people worldwide.

4. Reebok “Terry Tate: Office Linebacker” (2003): To boost productivity, a CEO recruits a linebacker from Reebok to slam into a series of “Office Space”-style cubicle drones.

What worked: A series of brutal hits, punctuated by lines such as, “Break was over 15 minutes ago, Mitch!” made this the best Super Bowl ad of the last five years.

The results: Terry Tate got people talking about Reebok for something other than sweatshop controversies. The company provides shoes for all the major sports and hosts clothing lines for rappers Jay-Z and 50 Cent.

3. E*Trade “Monkey” (2000): Two dim-witted guys and a monkey clap to some cha-cha music in a garage, followed by the punch line: “Well we just wasted 2 million bucks. What are you doing with your money?”

What worked: Easily the cheapest ad of the year to produce, it was an instant classic —remaining self-deprecating about dot-com excess while lampooning the well-publicized cost of Super Bowl ad time.

The results: The marketing Gods have a way of punishing tech companies that blow too much money on flashy ads. (See: Pets.com. Or don’t. They haven’t been around since 2000.) E*Trade lost hundreds of millions of dollars in 2001 and 2002, and the company’s shares — once trading at more than $60 — dropped below $3 in 2002. The company has since bounced back to profitability.

2. Coke “Mean Joe Greene” (1979): A kid offers his Coca-Cola to a battle-weary “Mean Joe” Greene — who softens up enough to toss his jersey as a reward.

What worked: A cute kid with a soft drink was the perfect foil for the surly Greene. Grown men still burst into tears when thinking about “Mean Joe” throwing that jersey.

The results: The ad became an instant pop culture classic, boosting Greene’s career. Among the offshoots was the inspiring “The Steeler and the Pittsburgh Kid” — perhaps the first hourlong TV movie in history to be based on a one-minute commercial.

1. Apple “1984” (1984): A jogger representing Apple throws a sledgehammer into a giant Big Brother image representing IBM — promising a populist shift in the future of personal computers.

What worked: With “Blade Runner” director Ridley Scott in charge, the ad generated more hype — and post-game water cooler talk — than any television commercial in history. Do you even remember who played in the Super Bowl in 1984? (L.A. Raiders and Washington.) You almost certainly remember the biggest Super Bowl ad of the year.

The results: The most storied Super Bowl ad of all time might have boosted sales of George Orwell books, hot red running shorts and sledgehammers. But it didn’t do much for the Macintosh — Apple continues to be the Reform Party of computer manufacturers. Maybe there was a storage locker filled with iPhones behind that huge video screen?

Honorable mentions: Pepsi “Apartment 10G” (1987); Pepsi “Diner” (1995); Pepsi “Sucked in” (1995); Mountain Dew “Bad Cheetah” (2000); Budweiser “Magic Fridge” (2006).

via msnbc.msn.com

SUPER BOWL GAMES VS. COMMERCIALS / Are ads superior to game?

Are ads superior to game?

 

“The Super Bowl ads are better than the game.”

No doubt you’ve heard at least one friend or relative make that statement, usually after a few drinks, a large gambling loss or a horrible set of Super Bowl events that mock the sports gods — such as Washington quarterback Mark Rypien being named MVP.

But have we really reached the point where commercials have become more entertaining than the sporting event that surrounds them?

Football purists will say they hate the ads, but they still seem to talk about them as much as the game itself. A good Super Bowl might get lost in your memory, but a good Super Bowl ad will be embedded in your brain for years to come. Chances are you remember every line and camera angle from Coke’s famous “Mean Joe Greene” commercial from 1979. But can you name the two teams that played the same year?

The rise in publicity for Super Bowl ads, big halftime shows and other off-field stunts are no accident. Although the Nielsen ratings for the Super Bowl have fallen over the decades, the game-watching demographic has widened to include more women and men who don’t like the sport.

“Originally it was just a football game, and guys who liked football were the ones who watched it,” says Don Bruzzone of Alameda’s Bruzzone Research Co., which has been measuring the effectiveness of Super Bowl commercials since 1992. “And then all of a sudden it grew into an extravaganza that would appeal to almost everybody.”

Super Bowl advertisements will cost about $2.6 million for a 30-second spot this year. (They cost a “mere” $324,000 when the San Francisco 49ers beat the Cincinnati Bengals in 1982.)

Bruzzone’s Paul Shellenberg says in terms of who’s advertising, 2007 is looking a lot like 2006 — with regulars such as Budweiser and Pepsi returning with several spots. As of Monday afternoon, there were fewer movie spots scheduled than usual, although Shellenberg said the studios often wait until the last minute.

The ads are a huge gamble for advertisers. Bruzzone’s research shows that a successful commercial gives a buyer eight times the impact of an ad that doesn’t resonate.

The price for an ad has become a punch line, which has even been used in the commercials themselves. When all the figures are added up, though, Bruzzone says research shows that advertisers aren’t throwing away their money.

“There are a lot of intelligent people making decisions about this sort of thing,” Bruzzone says. “They’re priced at just about what they’re worth.”

Bruzzone doesn’t keep track of which are “good years” and “bad years” for Super Bowl advertisers. Fortunately, we do. What surrounds this article is a sincere and enthusiastic — while not especially objective — attempt to determine whether the ads are, in fact, more entertaining than the game.

My methodology was simple, if not scientific: I’ve already watched every game for the past 10 years, and I spent several afternoons last week watching Super Bowl ads archived on YouTube and the very helpful Superbowl-ads.com Web site.

You can decide whether it’s worth your time to add up my winners and losers to find out who’s ahead — but I will reveal that it’s close. Look for a Monday morning SFGate.com Culture Blog entry that determines whether Sunday’s Super Bowl commercials were better than the game.

 


SUPER BOWL GAMES VS. COMMERCIALS

XXXI (1997)

The game: Green Bay 35, New England 21

The ads: Fred Astaire dances with a Dirt Devil vacuum and Holiday Inn promotes their renovations by joking about a guy who has undergone a sex change.

Final score: Neither side wanted to win. The game was predictably one-sided — Brett Favre (left) and the Packers were favored by 14 points and won by 14 points — but the ads were worse, including a digitally enhanced Astaire corpse and Holiday Inn’s big “screw you” to the gay, lesbian and transgender community. Football 9, commercials 2

 


XXXII (1998)The game: Denver 31, Green Bay 24

The ads: Louie the Lizard tries killing off the Budweiser frogs, while a guy eating a lot of Tabasco spells doom for a mosquito that tries to suck his blood.

Final score: Terrell Davis running over the heavily favored Packers was cool, as was the sight of John Elway receiving his first Super Bowl ring. But it’s hard to beat an exploding bug. Commercials 31, football 24

 


XXXIII (1999)The game: Denver 34, Atlanta 19

The ads: The Monster.com “When I Grow Up” ads spoof corporate culture, Budweiser has a firehouse dalmatian puppy spot and Victoria’s Secret’s sexy ad proves that horny men are still the primary Super Bowl demographic.

Final score: Not sure what was more annoying — Just for Feet’s semi-racist ad that appeared to feature white guys tranquilizing a black runner from Kenya or the Atlanta Falcons’ stupid “dirty bird” dance. The ads gain the edge when Falcons safety Eugene Robinson gets arrested for solicitation of prostitution the night before the game. Commercials 14, football 10

 


XXXIV (2000)The game: St. Louis 23, Tennessee 16

The ads: E-Trade unveils its classic dancing monkey/”We just wasted 2 million bucks” commercial and EDS features its memorable spot about cat herders.

Final score: This is why TiVo was invented. The 2000 Super Bowl and commercial-fest were both so entertaining that there was literally no time to urinate. With arguably the most entertaining Super Bowl of all time and the best commercials falling on the same year, there can be no losers. Commercials 42, football 42 (tie)

 


XXXV (2001)The game: Baltimore 34, New York 7

The ads: Cedric the Entertainer shills for Budweiser, Bob Dole shills for Pepsi and EDS features the “running of the squirrels.”

Final score: Not a great year for commercials — does anyone even know what EDS sells? But the ads were still way better than this defense-oriented game, which featured the coma-inducing combination of Trent Dilfer and Kerry Collins as starting quarterbacks. Commercials 15, football 6

 


XXXVI (2002)The game: New England 20, St. Louis 17

The ads: Charles Schwab features Barry Bonds, the Coen brothers direct an H&R Block commercial and several ads feature 9/11 tributes.

Final score: The post-9/11 commercials were classy, but became repetitive — and in retrospect, the Barry Bonds/Hank Aaron home run goof looks like something that should be turned over to the grand jury. The football game was a lot better, with Adam Vinatieri (above) kicking a last-minute field goal to seal the win. Football 28, commercials 17

 


XXXVII (2003)The game: Tampa Bay 48, Oakland 21

The ads: Reebok’s Terry Tate: Office Linebacker, the “Cast Away” movie spoof and a Clydesdale football instant replay commercial all generate big laughs.

Final score: The only thing uglier than Budweiser’s crude “Upside Down Clown” ad was the Raiders’ game plan, which gave up 34 unanswered points to former Oakland coach Jon Gruden’s Buccaneers. The refs almost had to invoke the mercy rule in this contest. Commercials 72, football 0

 


XXXVIII (2004)The game: New England 32, Carolina 29

The ads: A Sierra Mist commercial featuring a bagpiper getting cold air blown up his kilt looks like a Jane Austen film next to Budweiser’s flatulent horse. The 78 other ads seem to be focused on erectile dysfunction.

Final score: Everything went right during the game — a great contest between the Panthers and Patriots — and everything went wrong between plays. Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction” (above) highlighted the crude and unoriginal commercials, which led to audience outrage and FCC action. Football 41, commercials minus 212

 


XXXIX (2005)The game: New England 24, Philadelphia 21

The ads: Diddy arrives at the red carpet in a Pepsi truck, Budweiser introduces a trash-talking cockatiel, and Ameriquest has a couple of decent-but-forgettable mistaken-identity ads.

Final score: Even though we didn’t have to see Mickey Rooney’s bare bottom (it was banned by the fun police), this was definitely a rebuilding year for the ad industry. Meanwhile, Tom Brady, linebacker Mike Vrabel (left) and the Patriots held off the Eagles and Terrell Owens, who stopped acting crazy for a few hours and added some drama by playing hurt. Football 35, commercials 3

 


XL (2006)The game: Pittsburgh 21, Seattle 10

The ads: A caveman gets chided for not using FedEx (it hasn’t been invented yet), Jim Henson’s Muppets are everywhere and the “magic fridge” gets Budweiser back on track.

Final score: The Seahawks didn’t come to play and neither did many of the advertisers, but at least we got to see a prehistoric dude get stomped on by a brontosaurus. Commercials 10, football 9

via sfgate.com

ABC Eyes First-Half Super Bowl Sellout

NEW YORK — With the exception of one 15-second spot, ABC has sold out the first half of Super Bowl XL, to be held at Detroit’s Ford Stadium on Feb. 5, according to Ed Erhardt, president, sales for ESPN/ABC Sports.

While Erhardt would not discuss specific advertisers, he did say two categories in particular were exceptionally strong and drawing more advertisers to the game than usual.

The first, which should come as no surprise with the game being held in Motown, is automotive. General Motors and Ford are believed to be in the game, while a Chrysler rep said the company had not finalized its Super Bowl plans. While some offshore brands are also in play, Volvo, a 2005 advertiser, is sitting out, according to sources. The company did not return a call by press time.

The financial services/insurance category is also strong, said Erhardt. Only Ameriquest, the mortgage services company, is a known in-game advertiser, but sources said that MasterCard is considering purchasing some time as well. As previously reported [Adweek, Dec 19], Visa, which advertised last year, is passing up the game this year to buy into the 2006 Winter Olympics in Turin, Italy, which begin Feb. 10, five days after the Super Bowl.

Meanwhile, Burger King said it would buy a spot in the Super Bowl for the first time in 11 years. The company said it purchased one 60-second spot that will be produced by its lead creative agency Miami-based Crispin Porter + Bogusky. The spot is set to air in the second pod of ads after the kick-off, BK said.

Additional advertisers not previously disclosed include Gillette and ESPN Mobile, which sources said is buying a 60-second spot and spending an additional $2.5 million to $3 million to produce a lavish ad for the game. Erhardt said the movie category also remains “very strong.”

Although he wouldn’t discuss pricing, Erhardt was “confident” that the average price of a 30-second unit would exceed last year’s $2.4 million. Now comes the hard part for ABC: selling out the second half of the game, which usually goes to the final week and sometimes the final day before the game. Erhardt wouldn’t discuss how many spots were left to sell of the 60 in-game units, but did confirm that there is also time available in both the third and fourth quarters. “Ideally, they should be sold out at this point,” said sports consultant Neal Pilson, former president of CBS Sports. “But I think they’ll get there.”

Thanks to what Erhardt called a “very busy week” leading up to Christmas, they “are where we want to be right now” in terms of a sellout, he said. He said the network has sold about as many ads four weeks before the game as it did for Super Bowl XXXVII in 2003, the last time ABC aired it. Others said that would put ABC at close to 90 percent sold, with between five to 10 spots still available.

Indeed, the word in sports advertising circles is that ABC was behind the normal pace leading into late December. “They were pacing behind, but they wrote some business in the last couple of weeks that got them basically to where everyone usually is with about a month to go,” said the head of one network sports sales department.

Among the complicating factors is the Olympics, which throws a huge amount of additional sports TV ad inventory into the first quarter. That season is already crowded with the Super Bowl in January and the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament in March, forcing tougher decisions on advertisers about where to place their money. McDonald’s also opted not to participate in the Super Bowl this year, after having done so last year, in part to focus on the Olympics. “It’s definitely an issue,” said the head of a top-10 media agency. “You take a look at some of the big Olympic sponsors, and they have to decide how much weight and how much they can afford to spend in a very restricted time frame. That’s the dilemma, and you have this problem every four years with the winter games.”

But Erhardt doesn’t see a problem and argues that there’s enough money in the relatively healthy sports marketplace to adequately feed all three of those major first-quarter sports franchises. “They’re both great franchises,” Erhardt said of the Olympics and the big game. “But people tune into the Super Bowl to watch the ads, and that’s a real point of difference. The fact that we are pacing where we were three years ago at this time leads me to believe that both properties will get supported.”

Further complicating matters is the heightened sensitivity (stemming from Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction” during the halftime show two years ago) over what constitutes appropriate ad content in a telecast seen by more than 100 million viewers nationwide. Case in point: GoDaddy.com, the domain-name company that has been arguing with ABC over standards and practices about the content of an ad it wants to run during the game. Last year, GoDaddy, then a first-time advertiser, stirred up controversy with an ad featuring a buxom woman who snaps a spaghetti strap to the skimpy top she’s wearing, nearly exposing herself to a congressional committee.

Erhardt confirmed the two sides are debating the contents of a new ad but says he’s “optimistic” about a positive outcome.

–Steve McClellan, Adweek

via brandweek.com

Passing Up on the Super Bowl: Visa, McDonald’s Are No-Shows

mediaweek.com

By Steve McClellan, Adweek and John Consoli

The price tag for a 30-second spot on Super Bowl XL, on ABC Feb. 5, 2006, is flat versus a year ago, when it was $2.4 million, sources said, making it the third time in five years that the cost to advertise during the big game has not increased. In addition, the Winter Olympics, as well as clients’ interest in newer ad platforms like wireless and an unwillingness to undergo the creative scrutiny of Super Bowl ads, could divert some dollars from the football telecast, media buyers said last week.

Perennial advertiser Visa is believed to be one client forgoing the Super Bowl in favor of the Olympics, and McDonald’s, an on-again-off-again Super Bowl advertiser that had one spot last year, is also taking a pass in 2006.

The Winter Olympics in Torino, Italy, coming just five days after the Super Bowl, was partly behind the decision of both Visa and McDonald’s to bow out of the game, sources said. Both are heavy Olympic advertisers and reason that their dollars will buy more exposure over the two-week Olympic run than 30 seconds during the game. One 30-second unit in the Olympics sells for about $700,000, roughly one-third the price of the upcoming Super Bowl.

“Spots in the Olympics are much cheaper, so you can run several to make up for the audience you would get in one Super Bowl spot, and there is no scrutiny about the creative level of commercials during the Olympics,” said one media agency executive who buys ads for clients in both events.

Just how seriously clients take their Super Bowl advertising can be seen in the controversy generated during last year’s telecast on Fox, when GoDaddy.com ran an ad that drew viewer complaints for being too risqué; Fox pulled that same spot later in the telecast. Fox insiders said Pepsi, which was in the same commercial pod as the first GoDaddy spot, also complained to the network about the ad, contending that it ruined the environment for its own spots.
Media buyers also said last week that the inevitable flurry of critiques and consumer polls following the game, such as the one in USA Today, is giving advertisers pause.

“Some just don’t like the scrutiny that comes with advertising in the Super Bowl,” said one ad agency executive.

Sources said McDonald’s was particularly miffed last year when its “Lincoln Fry” spot got spectacularly poor reviews among critics and consumers. The company had decided last year that if its spot didn’t make the top 10 in the USA Today poll, it would not be back in the ’06 game, sources said. McDonald’s had no comment.
Still, some brands don’t want to miss the chance to reach the usual 100 million-plus viewers in the U.S. Ameriquest, CareerBuilder.com, FedEx and Paramount all confirmed they are returning.

Anheuser-Busch, the biggest advertiser in the game for years (it’s had the exclusive beer category for 18 years), is returning again with its typical 10 units. But the beer maker will be reevaluating the strategy going forward, said vp, global media and sports marketing Tony Ponturo. “We’ve had benefits doing long-term [Super Bowl] deals, but we’ll be more cautious to some degree because you may tie up dollars that you want flexibility on going out years two and three” in a contract, explained Ponturo.

Last month, the St. Louis-based company said it would begin to shift ad dollars from TV to cable and the Internet. “When you realize that 55 to 60 percent of TV time for viewers 21 to 34 years old is spent with cable, and they’re spending six hours a week on the Internet,” Ponturo said, “you better spread your dollars to the consumer.” That said, he added that A-B “still believes strongly” in the Super Bowl as an ad vehicle.

The price of a 30-second spot has remained relatively flat in recent years because, sources say, marketers have become more reluctant to spend so much. In the 24 years that Nielsen Monitor-Plus has tracked prices in the game, the cost to advertise has increased all but six times, with five of those instances coming in the last 10 years. More recently, the price for the 2003 telecast was down 2 percent to $2.15 million per :30. In 2002, the price was unchanged at $2.2 million.

How far along ABC is in selling the game is uncertain. The network would not comment at all last week on its progress—a possible sign that the game may not be selling as well as in past years.
Normally at this time of year, at least 75 percent of the 58 in-game spots have been sold, and the network with the game confirms, if only on background, how many it has left. Last year at this time, Fox was 75 percent sold, and in 2003, CBS was roughly 80 percent sold.

There are some indications from the client side that Super Bowl time is not selling as quickly as in past years. Procter & Gamble confirmed that its brands would be on the sidelines for the second consecutive year, with the possible exception of recently acquired Gillette, for which plans have not been finalized, a company representative said. And perennial advertiser Pepsi is reducing its spot load by one or two, sources said.

General Motors will showcase its Cadillac brand once again this year, but a rep said the number of spots that GM will put in the game was not finalized (last year it had six in-game spots). But the automaker still sees value in the game. Said Steve Tihanyi, GM’s director of entertainment and spots sponsorships, “Even people who don’t care about the game want to be a part of it in some way because it’s so big.”

Super Bowl Ads Lead to Bigger Box Office

http://www.adweek.com/aw/regional/west/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000789762

By Gregory Solman

LOS ANGELES A study of Super Bowl advertising effectiveness shows that movies marketed during the big game perform 40 percent better at the box office than films that are not.

The report by Rama Yelkur, Chuck Tomkovick and Patty Traczyk, of the marketing department of the University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, was first published in the Journal of Advertising Research. It covered 21 movies advertising on the Super Bowl telecast from 1998 to 2001, though the professors said the model has been shown to apply to 2002 to 2004. In 2003, for example, all 10 movies advertised on the game opened at No. 1 at the box office.

“We studied the movies because the data is pure and available,” said Tomkovick. “In a sense, it is always a new product,” with no prior box-office accumulation. The research discovered that movie marketers who advertise on the Super Bowl earn better opening weekend revenue, first week business and bigger total U.S. receipts.

To purify their model, the authors dismissed artsy, small- and mid-budget releases that would be unlikely candidates to advertise at Super Bowl rates of millions of dollars per 30-second spot. “We looked at male-oriented, youth-oriented action or comedy movies in pre-packaged forms,” said Yelkur. “The movies compared had to have made the top 10 for at least one week. And we looked only at February to August releases.”

Tomkovick added that the study took into account the placement of the movie within the game, and factored “a smattering of [overall] marketing investment as a criteria” to even the playing field. “The score of the game doesn’t turn off the Super Bowl advertising viewers,” he said, adding that 8 percent of all viewers watch the game solely for the new commercials. “In fact, we’re found that the less scintillating the game, the more attention is paid to the commercials. That’s how it’s gone from being the Super Bowl to the Bud Bowl to the Ad Bowl.”

Super Bowl XXXIX – Movie ads do register

http://www.sportsbusinessnews.com/index.asp?story_id=43884

Spending millions to advertise in the Feb. 6 Super Bowl will likely pay off for Hollywood’s movie studios, say marketing experts at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, who have studied Super Bowl advertising for five years.

Advertisements during the high-profile game are selling for an average of $2.4 million per 30-second spot, a record amount for the National Football League’s championship game.

The movie industry is among those most likely to benefit from advertising in the game, said Charles Tomkovick, UW-Eau Claire professor of management and marketing, who with Rama Yelkur, associate professor of management and marketing, completed the first known Super Bowl advertising effectiveness study of its kind.

“All else being equal, spending $2 million-plus for a movie ad in the Super Bowl will pay off handsomely for most studios,” Tomkovick said.

Research results, which were published in the Journal of Advertising Research, found that the average Super Bowl promoted film achieved twice as much first weekend, first week and total U.S. box office revenue than non- Super Bowl promoted movies. Even when researchers applied more rigorous tests, controlling for release dates and budget size, they found similar results.

Hollywood began running a couple of Super Bowl ads in the early 1990s. Then in 1996, Fox spent $1.1 million to promote “Independence Day,” which achieved U.S. revenues of $300 million and $500 million worldwide.

“This was the turning point,” Yelkur said. “Movie advertisers en masse realized the benefits of Super Bowl advertising.” Eight movies were advertised in 2002 and 10 in 2003.

Researchers examined box office gross revenues for movies advertised during the 1998-2001 Super Bowls. They compared it with data from a random sample of movies that weren’t advertised during the game over the same time. They compared first weekend, first week and total U.S. box office revenues. They controlled for movie release dates and refined their analysis to include only high budget films.

Opening weekend revenues for Super Bowl promoted movies in 2002 and 2003 were phenomenal, Tomkovick said. Fifteen of the 18 earned the top U.S. Box Office position for their opening weekend. Two came in second and the weakest of the 18 premiered at No. 4.

Source:University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire

Muppets Cut Up for Dippin’ Strips

http://www.adweek.com/aw/creative/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000779018

By Mae Anderson

Kermit and Miss Piggy star in a return engagement for Pizza Hut.

NEW YORK The Muppets will star in a Pizza Hut spot by BBDO breaking just before the Super Bowl kickoff.

The ad shows Miss Piggy, Kermit the Frog and other Muppets clowning and enjoying Pizza Hut’s new Dippin’ Strips pizza.

Janet Lyons was executive creative director and copywriter on the spot for the New York agency. Chris Curry was associate creative director and art director. Tommy Troncoso also served as copywriter, and Monica Victor was executive producer.

The commercial is part of an estimated $20 million campaign for Dippin’ Strips pizza. The effort includes other TV spots that began airing Jan. 23, as well as print, radio and online ads.

This is the second year Pizza Hut has enlisted the Muppets for a pre-game spot. Last year, they starred along with Jessica Simpson in an ad touting the Dallas-based chain’s 4ForAll Pizza. The client has advertised in a pre-kickoff spot on the Super Bowl for nine years.

Pizza Hut spent about $225 million on advertising in 2003, according to Nielsen Monitor-Plus.

Super Bowl ad money likely to pay off

http://www.nwherald.com/StyleSection/313174661107154.php

NORTHWEST HERALD

EAU CLAIRE, Wis. – Spending millions to advertise in the Feb. 6 Super Bowl will likely pay off for Hollywood’s movie studios, say marketing experts at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, who have studied Super Bowl advertising for five years.

Advertisements during the high-profile game are selling for an average of $2.4 million per 30-second spot, a record amount for the National Football League’s championship game.

The movie industry is among those most likely to benefit from advertising in the game, said Charles Tomkovick, UW-Eau Claire professor of management and marketing, who with Rama Yelkur, associate professor of management and marketing, completed the first known Super Bowl advertising effectiveness study of its kind.

“All else being equal, spending $2 million-plus for a movie ad in the Super Bowl will pay off handsomely for most studios,” Tomkovick said.

Research results, which were published in the Journal of Advertising Research, found that the average Super Bowl promoted film achieved twice as much first weekend, first week and total U.S. box office revenue than non-Super Bowl promoted movies. Even when researchers applied more rigorous tests, controlling for release dates and budget size, they found similar results.

Hollywood began running a couple of Super Bowl ads in the early 1990s. Then in 1996, Fox spent $1.1 million to promote “Independence Day,” which achieved U.S. revenues of $300 million and $500 million worldwide.

“This was the turning point,” Yelkur said. “Movie advertisers en masse realized the benefits of Super Bowl advertising.” Eight movies were advertised in 2002 and 10 in 2003.

Researchers examined box office gross revenues for movies advertised during the 1998-2001 Super Bowls. They compared it with data from a random sample of movies that weren’t advertised during the game over the same time. They compared first weekend, first week and total U.S. box office revenues. They controlled for movie release dates and refined their analysis to include only high budget films.

CareerBuilder.com Offers Pre-Game Preview of Super Bowl TV Ads

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050124/cgm025_1.html

Press Release Source: CareerBuilder.com

CHICAGO /PRNewswire/ — CareerBuilder.com is today the nation’s largest online job network with more than 15 million unique visitors* and over 600,000 jobs, and it’s getting ready to tell job seekers in a big way — by launching its largest marketing campaign in company history with a spend of over $200 million**. The year-long campaign, designed to raise awareness for CareerBuilder.com’s #1 position in online recruitment, will officially launch at the Super Bowl, but a pre-game sneak peak will begin appearing online today.(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20050124/CGM025 )

CareerBuilder.com publicly released the first spot from its new TV advertising campaign this morning at http://www.careerbuilder.com/TV as part of a major online marketing blitz. The ad features a humorous twist on office life with a frustrated male human employee working in a chaotic cubicle environment where fellow employees just so happen to be chimpanzees. As the human employee witnesses various antics around the office where he is left to pick up the slack, he laments to a disgruntled customer on the phone, “I’m sorry. It’s just that I work with a bunch of monkeys.”

CareerBuilder.com purchased two 30-second spots that will air during the second and third quarters of the Super Bowl. The spots feature more tales from the office, parodying dissatisfying work experiences and providing words of encouragement to viewers with a new tag line: “a better job awaits.”

The campaign was created by Cramer-Krasselt, the agency that also developed CareerBuilder.com’s “Plan Your Escape” campaign in 2004 and Effie- award winning “Smarter Way to Find a Better Job” campaign in 2003.

“The new creative offers the kind of comical entertainment that is sure to get people talking around the water cooler the next day,” said Richard Castellini, Vice President of Consumer Marketing for CareerBuilder.com. “While exploring the trials of an unsatisfying work environment, we are also driving home a memorable brand message that CareerBuilder.com is the top online resource for finding a better job. We believe this message will resonate with viewers and look forward to scoring in the big game.”

“The Super Bowl is the most widely viewed event of the year where the audience is actively engaged in watching commercials,” said Matt Ferguson, CEO of CareerBuilder.com. “CareerBuilder.com’s advertising during the game and other high profile events marks a significant milestone in our brand awareness initiative. By marketing to a potential audience of over 180 million in 2005 with a message that many of today’s workers can identify with, CareerBuilder.com is attracting a new lineup of talent for employers and strengthening our leadership position in the online recruitment industry.”

CareerBuilder.com’s Super Bowl appearance is kicking off a multi-faceted, national marketing program which also includes its advertising debut at the Academy Awards, the Grammy’s and the NCAA Final Four. In addition to advertising at widely viewed events, the company is consistently reaching out to its target audience through a combination of primetime national network and cable television, local radio, print, outdoor ads and mobile marketing. It will be supplemented with in-kind advertising support from the more than 130 newspapers, 48 television stations and Web sites of owners Tribune Company, Gannett and Knight Ridder.

*comScore Media Metrix, November 2004. The CareerBuilder Network is a custom aggregation of CareerBuilder.com traffic as well as job search traffic to career centers CareerBuilder powers for partner sites such as Tribune Company, Gannett, Knight Ridder and others.

**SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, December 2004 – includes in-kind promotions from Tribune Company, Gannett and Knight Ridder.

About CareerBuilder.com

CareerBuilder.com is the nation’s leading online job network with more than 15 million unique visitors and over 600,000 jobs. Owned by Gannett Co., Inc. (NYSE: GCI – News), Tribune Company (NYSE: TRB – News), and Knight Ridder, Inc. (NYSE: KRI – News), the company offers a vast online and print network to help job seekers connect with employers. CareerBuilder.com powers the online career centers for more than 450 partners that reach national, local, industry, diversity and niche audiences. These include more than 130 newspapers and leading portals such as America Online and MSN. More than 30,000 of the nation’s top employers take advantage of CareerBuilder.com’s easy job postings, 10 million-plus resumes, comprehensive screening tools and more. Millions of job seekers visit the site every month to search for opportunities, sign up for automatic email job alerts, and get advice on job hunting and career management. For more information, visit http://www.careerbuilder.com .

Media Contact: Jennifer Sullivan (773)527-1164 jennifer.sullivan@careerbuilder.com

Source: CareerBuilder.com